I've heard him speak before the Tennessee Legislature and thought he was spot on with some of his arguments, so this surprised me when I came across it this morning:
Comments (15)
sorted by:
That was seven years ago. How is he doing now?
doesn't matter, stilla grifter. this is what people get for following nobodies who have an opinion. great we all have them, no need to feed the grift.
Thanks for clarifying the date of this - completely slipped my mind. I looked around twitter and truth social to try and get a bead on his current train of thinking, and if anything noteworthy comes up I'll post it. Regardless, I find myself more and more becoming increasingly skeptical of anything that anyone posts. I took a little break from it all recently and noticed that when I came back, it was the same stuff, different day. Thanks again.
Too bad so sad
I am reminded of "be careful who you follow." First thing I thought of, actually. I think this guy just lost a lot of support.
Matt Walsh comes from the same vein as Shapiro, Owens, etc. Want an idea of who his handlers are? Pull up the video of a kid asking him about the jews. All those "MATT SLAMS LEFTIST MORON" videos where the indoctrinated retard tries challenging him and get dunked on and just freezes up and looks stupid. Well that freeze up happens to him exactly and listen to his words carefully.
Matt Walsh is a crypto-kike himself.
It's the only kind Israel will allow airtime.
I stopped caring about people early on in this journey and focus only on evidence and analysis.
Yes…and I was still watching FOX…
This article is from 2016 (The Blaze). I haven't followed Matt much lately, but I wonder what his stance is today (he has probably stated it somewhere). I actually have written off all of The Daily Wire and its members, though Matt was my favorite. I like that they are conservative, but I don't necessarily like the way the go about making their points.
He was 100% wrong about how Donald Trump would govern, and looking back he must feel pretty stupid
Petty, foolish, close minded, if he still feels that way. Probably too stubborn to admit it if he doesn't.
He also said that the idea of a teenager is a modern construct and that teenage pregnancy isn’t problematic within the confines of marriage.
He also thanked congress for voting to impeach Trump in 2021.
So, anti-Trump and sees teen pregnancy (specifically mentioned 17 as the starting age for women being their most fertile). It may not be Epstein, but it is a bit too close to the line (or well over the line depending on his views of the appropriate age for the husband in that situation), especially when paired with the anti-Trump views.
My stepfather, who raised me - his mother was married and pregnant the first time at 13. She had 3 miscarriages before she had her first child.
He was out of the house and on his own at 13 yrs old as well. He joined the service as soon as he could [younger than 18] and served in Korea.
My husband's father was out of the house and on his own at 14 yrs. Because he'd had scarlet fever and a damaged heart he could not join the service, but he found a farming family who put him up in their barn in exchange for farm work.
Thinking was different in the not too distant past. I know half of my Irish ancestors were worked to death by their fifties.
I'm not supporting marriage before 18 in any greater context than the fact that it used to be extremely common.
13 was still way too young, but 17...not so much.
My own mother married and had her 1st child at 17, and her 2nd [me] at 19.
Be watchful of those who make their impact going after "low hanging fruit" issues (trans, abortion, free speech, guns etc) These are common sense issues and perfect things to sneak into MAGA with. No shit sherlock, men cant be women. Now speak on the 2020 election. Oh wait?