Normies will deny, deny, deny, deny. If you send this report to them.
However, it is very clear that the report talks about now criminalising sexual activities with people who are under the age of consent or who are under 18.
Normies will say "Baaaa - most 17 year olds (ie under the age of 18) are more than capable of making decisions about sexual consent.
But the real problem with this report is that the age of 5 is also below the age of consent and under 18. If it's OK at 17 then logically this report is arguing that it's OK for an adult to fuck a 5 year old, so long as the 5 year old can be convinced to say they "consented". And we've seen how the genital mutilation trannies have managed to get away with saying young kids should be allowed to "consent" to having their balls/dick or tits cut off.
This is deeply disturbing and the authors need to be shamed for this.
Normies will deny, deny, deny, deny. If you send this report to them.
However, it is very clear that the report talks about now criminalising sexual activities with people who are under the age of consent or who are under 18.
Normies will say "Baaaa - most 17 year olds (ie under the age of 18) are more than capable of making decisions about sexual consent.
But the real problem with this report is that the age of 5 is also below the age of consent and under 18. If it's OK at 17 then logically this report is arguing that it's OK for an adult to fuck a 5 year old, so long as the 5 year old can be convinced to say they "consented". And we've seen how the genital mutilation trannies have managed to get away with saying young kids should be allowed to "consent" to having their balls/dick or tits cut off.
This is deeply disturbing and the authors need to be shamed for this.