I've always felt that the most important question anyone can ask is WHY. I suspect most anons feel exactly as I do. I suspect that's why we're all in this club; because we ask WHY. So we've all heard of the 16 year plan. Obama conducted the first 8 years of the plan and Killery was supposed to accomplish the last 8 years of their plan. But my question that I pose is, WHY 16 years? WHY must this plan be completed before 2024?
So we, by electing President Trump, interrupted their timetable. Now the deep state, the cabal or whatever we term them is in overdrive to complete their plan within the 16 year window. They seem to have accelerated everything to the point that they don't seem to care about the optics anymore. It used to be they did things so slowly that it was hard to notice. Well, anons noticed but the sheeple didn't. But now everyone notices, even the blind normies.
But WHY? WHY must things be completed before 2024? They've bided their time for a millennia but all a sudden this shit has to be complete NOW. If they've been at this shit for literally 100's of years, what's the mad rush? WHY not adjust the plan to add a few more years? Do they know something we don't?
I truly wish to know the opinions of my fellow anons whom I respect greatly.
Its an interesting question. I'm just going to think out loud with a bunch of "maybe" and "what if" language because I don't know what I don't know.
Maybe "Climate Change" is a code word for a change in conditions that is unfavorable to them that will occur after the 16 years. The only thing they talk about as being of imminent unavoidable danger, the kind of doomsday clock that would require 16 year plans etc, is "Climate Change".
Whatever "Climate Change" means, its not about the weather, they keep parroting the same concept often with what sounds enough like genuine concern to me -- but because none of their power apparatus is making any real effort to fight the exact thing they have us believing "climate change" is, and we do know they they would have had all the power to actually resist the "climate change" they only pretend to resist -- I think it has a double meaning.
If they wanted to stop industrial pollution, this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to clean up the trash continent in the Pacific Ocean. this was always in their power to do. If they wanted to terraform land to maximize tree growth and stop the destruction of the rain forests this was all in their power to do. If they wanted to build towards renewable energy and in massive supply, nuclear power has existed for almost a century now and has been suppressed, the completion of that suppression appears to coincide with 2024 (that's interesting), with reactors being taken offline as we speak. If they wanted a stable population that had the ability to conserve resources they would not have done so much to over-produce low quality goods and degrade people's options to be self-sufficient. This was entirely in their power to influence the world into a positive direction, instead they accelerated towards the opposite direction.
It could just be greed -- but when you print paper money and have what is effectively a blank check, the logic fails that it would be simple greed, and rigging your paper money system (that gives you a substantial and nearly unlimited advantage in the world) to fail, when you have the ability to prevent it from failing, just doesn't make sense in the context of simple greed.
So what exactly is "Climate Change", really?
Good points!
I would add, we could even solve the 20.000 nuclear waste by processing it in thorium reactors. The then leftovers could be used to construct nano-diamond batteries.
The enormous amounts of plastic waste can be cleaned up by a Japanese process turning plastic into an energy carrier. The cleanup would pay for itself.
And yet: choices and consequences. And they are all geared towards ..... oppression instead of freedom.
Why would that be?
Would it be power for power's sake? Power as the ultimate wet dream of fake gods.
I don't think its power in a defined achievable, completable form.
I think the strategy with them isn't so much that they need specific benchmarks or powers (typically). There is no "enough is enough". They are committed to the pursuit and path of power and the degradation and defeat of all competition. Forever. All that is not them is their enemy. It is a bottomless hole they dig for us and a never-ending climb for them. Think of it like them being a culture of evil Johnny Appleseeds. They will sow the seeds and sow the seeds and sow the seeds forever because this is how they stay in power and that work is never done because they know that the natural order is in opposition to their ethos and actions. It is more appropriate to call it an ethos, and because it is an ethos it can be somewhat self-organizing and self-growing.
The only way to defeat it is with the opposing ethos, to be good Johnny Appleseeds, and sow the seeds and sow the seeds and sow the seeds, in opposition to evil.
That's a digression though. They did set a benchmark and a goal this time, and its possible they did that because a WH plan prevents them from retreating or turning the volume down so people will go back to sleep. They either lost patience for some reason, which is entirely out of character for the evil Johnny Appleseeds, or they are on a time limit -- whether their deadline is imposed by WHs or something unknown to us at this time.
This whole thread is great. I'm going to reading this for weeks at the rate its going.
I would agree. Power of power's sake.
It seems to me a more or less abstract idea yet always in comparison to others. It may even be the ultimate consequence of a social Darwinian outlook which eventually leads to nihilism, or a black hole: nothing really matters. so, why not be scrupulous about it.
Indeed, for it puts limits on the limitless bullshit touted as social Darwinism or whatever is the source of their lack of scruples.
I wonder whether it is not a combination as a third option. Because of the time-limit, lost time has to be made up to keep things in lockstep. And what is really on that speed-up time-frame? From what I can see, the total destruction of the fabric of society as we knew it, in order to achieve healthy regeneration within a natural balance, while the technological development into the desired state is moving along at warp-speed.
I 100% agree with you, and have thought “climate change” has another meaning for a while now, since it’s obviously not about the weather as you have outlined above. What I wonder is how do they know that the Great Awakening is coming? they must have been able to see the future decades ago.