4
SaucerSometimes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its cynical, but the NRA is a business. They're in the business of making money. For 100 to 350 Million a year for decades we gave them enough ammo to wage lawfare. The constitution is backing their position and the constitution is ironclad in the Supreme Court. If a case is seen by a Judge, it goes to the constitution. So where's the disconnect? The NRA is not getting our cases seen.

If I had to guess most of the money goes to political grift. They're fucking around with funding legislative campaigns (of uniparty cunts like Romney as an example) instead of taking the fight to the Supreme Court where they should be. That's problematic.

Not saying they're worthless but they're suspect.

2
SaucerSometimes 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you've ever wondered what Israel 3,500 years ago looked like, then welcome to the "progressive" future.

I didn't know the Bee was this based.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was saying the same thing in the first thread about this C5 posted. No way the commander lets that shit get painted on his boat unless its over his head. Its fresh paint, and I bet they got the photo and cleaned that shit off before it had time to dry.

The choice of using a patch design associated with Patton's "Ghost Army" says "deceiving the enemy about the locations of friendly forces".

Also, the ghost patch isn't 4th PsyOps Group, their patch is 3 lightning bolts on a tri-color field, I don't remember the colors. They're not nearly as sophisticated as any of this. They were the eggheads that came up the brilliant idea to print Quran verses on soccer balls and give them to Afghani kids so they could kick their holy scriptures around in the dirt. If the goal was to make sure we had a hot fighting season it worked. They're either twisted smart or they're just demented retards, and you can never tell.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm buying bulk non-perishables now. T-Shirts are a dumb thing to buy right now. I agree. Besides, buying T-Shirts isn't going to make the government afraid of the people. Best things in life are free. Relentless obscenities and vitriol, the hatred and rejection of their entire nation. Their descendants will change their names to distance themselves from the shame.

3
SaucerSometimes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now if people could only boycott every corporation that lobbies the government to achieve advantage at the expense of the people. They don't need to steal your votes if they win no matter who you elect.

3
SaucerSometimes 3 points ago +3 / -0

One of the big problems with this movie we're watching is that I don't know how they're going to make that pivotal transformation in the plot where the government becomes a solution to the problem of the government.

4
SaucerSometimes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Historians are just going to shitcan our entire contribution to history and call this a Dark Age of bullshit.

This is going to read like 100 years of Finnegan's Wake.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

copyright of:

https://www.llresearch.org/

and this Tobey Wheelock guy that looks like a California Jeffrey Epstein:

https://youtu.be/yErzWj1RIwE


I don't like relentless positivity cults as a rule. If this world doesn't break your heart then you're not paying attention. Its why God sent JC to pay the ransom. There was no other way.

4
SaucerSometimes 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_E._Vallely

Vallely is also a supporter of the Jerusalem Summit organization Archived 2006-07-12 at the Wayback Machine and an advocate of the organization's proposal Archived 2010-01-13 at the Wayback Machine to "relocate"/"resettle" Palestine and the Palestinian people to surrounding Arab countries as a solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and to bring about the Israel's divinely-inspired rebirth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbos_goy

And he was a colleague of Aquinos and McInerney.

Hard pass.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_E._Vallely

Together with Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, Vallely co-authored a book published in 2004, titled Endgame: The Blueprint for Victory in the War on Terror.

Vallely also co-authored a 1980 paper with then PSYOP analyst Michael Aquino, founder of the satanist Temple of Set, titled From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory. MindWar is defined as "the deliberate aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war." The paper contrasts a use of psychological operations such as propaganda with a new approach.

Small world. He's a collaborative colleague of General "Catholic Satellites" McInerney and General "Hail Satan" Aquino? What are the odds of that?

3
SaucerSometimes 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've actually had a lot of victories over the past 7ish years.

Who'd have thought the Streissand Effect would unravel an ancient evil empire at the height of its power.

2
SaucerSometimes 2 points ago +2 / -0

I downvoted this but I want to explain why, assuming you aren't being sarcastic.

To put it simply, imagine that they are trying to put us all on welfare (because they are), then consider your post from that perspective.

0
SaucerSometimes 0 points ago +3 / -3

In an ideal world your entire clan would occupy a sizable piece of land. You would spend your days teaching your grandkids how to bring whatever products your clan makes from conception all the way to market. Your "social security" would be 5 generations of your people working together. No one would ever go hungry or without shelter. Your police would be a militia of your own brethren. You would govern no one but your own kin, and no one who is not your kin would ever govern you.

It sounds farfetched in the context of the world as we know it, but this was the system before Rome imposed its law on western civilization and though we still have some cultural memory of the moral character of the civilizations we used to be (concepts like freedom, honor, integrity) before being conquered by the Roman system and the Abrahamic religion -- which were not the source of our moral character or cultural memory. There was a deliberate effort to perpetrate a history that would vilify (and literally invert) the swastika (a symbol unifying Scythian/Gothic tribalism) and the word Aryan (and so burying an Arian Christianity that was truer to what Jesus taught than the weaponized Christianity of Roman Catholicism) all in one final swoop before modernization and the information age would be allowed to progress any further -- and that was by design, I think.

Sorry, you asked a simple question an I gave you a weird answer.

In the real world that we're stuck in, Social Security is necessary. You don't have a clan or land or a future, just a present need to eat and survive as an isolated citizen of a paper empire that doesn't give a fuck about you beyond the optics of you starving after a lifetime of citizenship and work while they eat caviar and steak off a silver plate with their uncalloused soft hands.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most thefts are inside jobs. Easier to rob yourself than it is rob someone else.

18
SaucerSometimes 18 points ago +18 / -0

The lawmen didn't do their jobs because they work for the same regime that the rioters do. We shouldn't have welfare, or a civilization where welfare can be justified to the people. The only reason it can be justified is because they have plundered the prosperity of the nation and have trapped us in a world where nothing can be built unless they can take undeserved profits from every endeavor and enterprise great or small. Once it was justified it was simply easier for most people to pursue easy bread instead of difficult freedom.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any government that is not by / of / for the people (kinship)

If the people do not believe that the government is them, then it is not them. Even a despotic monarchy could accomplish this and be considered just and evidently even a democracy can fail at this and be considered unjust.

None of us have ever really lived in a time where we had the kinship towards/from our government or the ruling class(es).

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly this.

But he's not on the DS side either.

Think of it like this, in 2024 Americans are going to have good candidates on the ballot on both sides. Compare that to the national cynicism of choosing the lesser of two evils every election cycle and being silently demoralized that the world keeps getting shittier and shittier. (2004 - 2017)

Even if he didn't "orange man bad" -- with Trump running he wouldn't get a single MAGA vote anyway. Not even if he wore a blue MAGA hat and summoned the memory of all his admirable kin. It doesn't make sense for him to play to Trump's base. Makes more sense for him to be the opposition, if that's what he is.

6
SaucerSometimes 6 points ago +6 / -0

If honor had any substance for Swalwell he would have resigned over that. The disgrace of it would have been his own and only his own. By holding onto his position the disgrace belongs to the entire nation.

Ironic that he fashions himself the defender of the FBI when Swalwell is a walking talking posterboy for their catastrophic failure at their counter intelligence job and their failure to do their job has every appearance of being in conflict with the best interests of the nation they are supposed to serve.

These are all dishonorable people and we are a dishonorable nation for allowing them to exist.

1
SaucerSometimes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Before Trump started engaging with social media Presidents (and other politicians) avoided public interactions like the plague. Out of sight out of mind. Especially on the Republican side.

Not Trump though, he wanted a channel to communicate directly to the people and bypass the gatekeepers. He wanted to throw wrenches in the narratives and slander without the lag time of having to call pressers and play their rigged media game by their rules.

I think it is important to him (because it is to all of us) that his communications are actually coming from him. The honesty of the thing is why it works.

2
SaucerSometimes 2 points ago +2 / -0

My grandpa had one in his garage.

2
SaucerSometimes 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I don't know how we're ever going to leave this building today, because if you look outside, it is terrible. But we'll figure a way, there's always a way."

It seems irrelevant to the topic -- but what he actually did with that was projected command authority and a genuine message of unity and relatability rather than hanging the whole briefing on "we hire black people and minorities" which is just an awkward topic in general. He didn't lose 1 beat in his rhythm either. That was like watching mind control in real time.

4
SaucerSometimes 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mike's faith is strong. He can take a lot of heat because he's got a friend in high places. He's got us too.

Its been over a year, I could use some new pillows.

3
SaucerSometimes 3 points ago +3 / -0

Longfellow's history is inaccurate.

Longfellow's poem was masonic propaganda. Washington expressed wariness of masonic propaganda and other founders expressed concerns too, The founders lived in a time in history when the Weishaupt illuminati were infiltrating the lodges. The founders were not the same people as the masons that came after them.

5
SaucerSometimes 5 points ago +5 / -0

15 years old and the kid cucked a police chief, soiled the the reputation of the mayor's daughter and got a pedo teacher fired, all while rounding 3rd base.

This kid is alright.

view more: Next ›