Flat Earther spends $20,000 on DIY experiment that accidentally proved the planet is ROUND
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
🌏 Sphere World 🌎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (308)
sorted by:
Why is this stickied on a site that tells everyone to go to conspiracies.win? Oh I know why.
Because the Mods know the Earth is a fracking spherical object that’s why. Oh whoa!! Dude my nametag is flashing Mod! Kek Kek.
How do the mods "know" Brent? There's a 3 bitcoin reward for one single proof of the globe waiting to be claimed. Just one proof. There should literally be dozens, if not hundreds, if not thousands of proofs.
I myself looked for that one proof for over 3 years to shut down a buddy of mine that kept nagging me about FE. Much to my surprise, I was never able to find one.
If you've got the proof but are unwilling to try and collect the 3 bitcoin (~$90K), share it with me and I'll submit it and split the prize with you.
Whadaya say?
Well how’s about the 100,000,000,000,000,000 Gigabytes of pictures, data, and scientific research papers from every university and scientific research station, including NASA, worth it’s salt proving the earth is a sphere, vs. a factual CIA paid for psyop to start the Flat Earth theory to bring people back to pre-Christopher Columbus assumptions, and O, zero, no, none, negative, no dice Clay pictures of a Flat Earth EVER! EeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeVER, beyond some rinky dink cartoon. I’ll wait for that 100% above Earth orbit live photography of a flat frisbee disk. Until then…. ya know where ta go. Around and around on an orbiting the Sun, 3rd main sphere from it and orbiting along in the not flat Milky Way.
And I’m not going to fall for the Bitcoin trick. Why? Because no matter the gazillions of proof shown the Earth is a sphere, the flat-earthers will ALWAYS always say, “Prove it! Prove it’s a sphere! Even with all that globally known and tested information and gazillions of pictures. But prove its not flat!” Yeah… I go to STFU at that point.
It's all a deception Brent.
Wouldn't you think we'd have a couple hundred space cameras on satellites at this stage of our technological evolution? Live feeds offering 24x7x365 views of the earth with over 30,000 satellites, both public and private now allegedly orbiting? Imagine the advertising opportunities alone! NASA could rake in kajillions and stop wasting taxpayer money on their endeavors alone.
Why don't the folks on the ISS take their own video cameras up and shoot a nice 90-minute video of their supposed one revolution around the earth? Heck, why doesn't the ISS have a permanent video running 24x7?
Something as simple as this would put the whole situation to rest, wouldn't it?
The realm we live in is far more complex than you imagine with your "no pictures of flat earth" complaint. For starters, it appears we cannot get any higher than perhaps 100 miles above the surface. Nobody knows this for sure but it seems there's a limit as to how high we can go - as if there's a barrier of some sort above us - dare I say a "firmament"?
As to your "proof" complaint, the challenge is to produce some SCIENTIFIC evidence, not pictures and videos that anybody could claim are fake. Surely there's some irrefutable scientific experiments that can prove the ball, curvature, rotation, earth moving, etc. Right?
Even the sham artist Einstein was forced to admit in his time that there was no way to scientifically prove the earth was moving or rotating. Nothing has changed since either. As it turns out, all the scientific experiments demonstrate that the earth is still and motionless. An inconvenient truth that the establishment works hard at keeping hidden I might add.
Now, as to Q and his response to the very basic question. I'm of the belief that the "earth realm" is indeed not "flat" and likely a sphere or oblate sperhiod. This realm includes both that which is above and below what we know of as "earth". I also believe this "earth realm" is indeed encased in a sort of bubble-like (firmament) wrapper of sorts. Of course I can't prove any of this. It's speculation. But my point is, Q could very well argue that the "earth realm" is anything but "flat" and I would agree. However, the 6 continents and 4 oceans we're all familiar with are definitely "flat" and there are zero scientific experiments that demonstrate otherwise. What passes for "science" in academia today are mathematical models and abstractions based on many ASSUMPTIONS that are baked into their models. Real science doesn't stand on assumptions and this is how we know we're being lied to about this earth realm. Because no assumptions would be required and the proofs would be plentiful.
So yeah, none of your kajillion bytes of photographic data pass as proof. But since the globe earth is "settled science", there should be hundreds or thousands of other data points that irrefutably prove the establishment claim. Not just pictures and videos produced by government agencies that we can all agree don't have our best interests in mind.