While Plan D is in motion, let me tell you about…
Plan E!!
It took two months of preparation and with the help of my younger brother Deron, I was able to successfully file a law suit against three of the members of the US Supreme Court Justices. They were legally and officially served March 17, 2023.
-
Elena Kagan
-
Sonia Sotomayor
-
Ketanji Brown Jackson
I'm accusing them of aiding and supporting enemies of the United States Government by refusing to protect the constitution by denying my petition regarding the allegations that there was interference in 2020 Presidential Election. My three defendants knew full well regarding the allegations, and for reasons that they need to explain, denied my petition. They are guilty of misprision of treason, which is "the deliberate concealment of one's knowledge of a treasonable act or a felony."
As of a few days ago, and in response to my lawsuit against them, they (like anyone else being sued) had to secure attorneys to represent them. They had no choice but to lawyer up, because by themselves, a US Supreme Court Judge does not have the power of influence over a lower court (unless an application for a temporary stay order is filed by a losing party regarding a decision made in the Federal Court, which of course, has nothing to do with the action of this case). Let me repeat. My defendants by themselves cannot and do not have any influence over a lower court. None. They are individuals who have to defend themselves, and in response to my action they acted accordingly. They lawyered up, and by doing so submitted to the future judgment of my local US District Court.
I want them to either grant me a hearing or be removed from office. Now, does my judge have the power to remove them from office? Yes, he actually does. So far there is nowhere in the rules, or statutes, or the Constitution that shows or indicates that my defendants have to be impeached first. In my study of law and how our government is structured, there is no legal power other than congress doing a majority vote that can stop the judicial branch from removing my three defendants from office. But, what if I prevail with my Federal Court Judge? My three defendants can appeal it. What if I win in the appellate court? They can appeal it to the US Supreme Court.
This means if I lose I can also appeal it. All the way to the US Supreme Court. What happens when it gets there? Clarence Thomas and colleagues will then have the opportunity (if they want) to grant me a hearing, and if I prevail, they could, with a court order, have them removed from office. Who and what power can stop them? An executive order from the U.S. President? No. Judges have often stopped Executive Orders. What about the DOJ? No again. They are also part of the executive branch. Outside of the rule that comes from the majority vote of congress, there is nothing more powerful in this country than a court order.
What's my next step?
Deron and I are now preparing an offer. A settlement offer that by law, must be delivered to my three defendants personally through their legal counsel. (This is pretty cool because I now have a direct path of communication to my defendants.) Anyway, my offer is going to be this: If they can acquire the vote of another associate Justice, which will give me the four needed votes, and grant me a hearing, I will drop my case against them!
To anyone who is a lawyer, this is laughable gibberish. Not trying to blackpill, but please do not send them any money. Happy to expound on the legal reasons if anyone wants to hear it.
Lawyers are the biggest reason our country is where it is. Eff off to the lawyers.
I don’t disagree (and I’m a lawyer). Just telling you the facts of what will happen - this entire idea is fundamentally legally flawed and will go nowhere.
Have you seen Deron's Complaint? http://www.cedarhillscitizens.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/00-Complaint-RJB-v-Sonia-et-al-March-17-2023.pdf
It may go nowhere but I believe it is very sound reasoning with impeccable sources. It screams American Patriot to me.
You are looking at this from the illegitimate system that has been operating since 1938. Common law is our birthright. You might become better acquainted with it because what's in use now is not going to persist--in a properly functioning Republic with really free people, that filthy pack of lies will be gone. I think that both you and I want a Constitutional Republic instead of the filthy rags that pretend to be anything legitimate.
My point is that they are asking the current judicial system for specific legal relief - they are not going to get anything remotely close to what they are asking for, regardless of whether Deron is a patriot or not. Whether the system is fair (it’s not) is a separate question.
I’m no lawfag and you could be correct. But even if it is laughable gibberish, would you agree that all the proceedings on Trump since 2016 are too? Games, pieces, moves.
As long as you say "Games, pieces, moves." after -- you can speak utter nonsense with absolute impunity.
I would absolutely agree 99% of proceedings have been gibberish or worse.
Still doesn't make anything you just said make sense.
Moves. Countermoves.
Kek. Now you’re talking. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. Life is a game? Nah. It’s for keeps. Your point is made fren. I haven’t completely dismissed this particular habbening just yet. You know, just watch and see. Nice user name btw.
Fuck you just made me laugh so hard 😆
I still think you're ridiculous. But I think I like you.
Yes, I agree. It doesn’t change that this lawsuit is 100% useless in terms of achieving anything.
These 3 clowns look like a special needs mariachi band and they write lawsuits similarly. It is retard level 11 the arguments in their suits. Like so bad you have to wonder how purposeful it is. Are they doing it for lulz or to make anyone promoting it look retarded? You have to wonder…
You can’t persuade anyone that has gone all in on these bogus suits. They don’t even realize that all the gibberish in the pages preceding their claims for relief doesn’t have any bearing on their claims for relief. Think of the idiocy of claiming that a lower court judge can remove a justice of the Supreme Court with zero explanation of how the constitution says judges serve for life but Congress can impeach and remove.
Then imagine that 2.5 years after egregious election fraud in 2020 and batting .000 in court on election fraud suits, a retard mariachi band trio inventing their own bogus legal theories and plucking their own remedies out of thin air are going to succeed when even the suits with merit failed to get anywhere.
Every single post promoting this case is lining their pockets with pure snake hopium oil grifting. These fags would fail an undergrad political science con law class. Believing this group to be part of some plan is pure unadulterated cope. Cope concentrate.
That’s why is the very near future, lawyer won’t even exist anymore. Look for position that available 100 yrs ago and no longer exist now. Then u will know what end time really meant for some people.
Isn't lawyer gibberish much of what is wrong with everything right now?
Why not use it?
There is nothing to use here - this will go nowhere.