Gonna play devil's advocate here.. Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter. When he "takes over someone's account" it probably means he's got some tech-savvy intern doing it for him, and he's telling them what to say. .............hold on a moment, maybe that's the loophole for him saying he doesn't know how to use Twitter, because if he is speaking through someone, that is technically him communicating on Twitter. So wow, even when attempting to play devil's advocate, I wound up realizing that Fauci was being deceitful in his side-stepping "answers."
Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter.
Saying something with the intent to mislead is textbook definition of lying. It doesn't matter if the statement is true or not, what matters is the intent and that was to mislead.
Gonna play devil's advocate here.. Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter. When he "takes over someone's account" it probably means he's got some tech-savvy intern doing it for him, and he's telling them what to say. .............hold on a moment, maybe that's the loophole for him saying he doesn't know how to use Twitter, because if he is speaking through someone, that is technically him communicating on Twitter. So wow, even when attempting to play devil's advocate, I wound up realizing that Fauci was being deceitful in his side-stepping "answers."
Saying something with the intent to mislead is textbook definition of lying. It doesn't matter if the statement is true or not, what matters is the intent and that was to mislead.
True, if the court of law didn’t look past this in political and white collar situations for as long as it has we’d been in a better spot as a society