For Bud Lights new Spokesperson…. RIDDLE ME THIS !!!🤔😵💫🤡
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
For those who aren't biologists: chromosomes definitively determine the gender of the individual. There is no debate of this point possible. It's just raw naked scientific fact, and it doesn't give a fuck about your feelings or twisted sex fantasies.
XX = female
XY = male
That's literally the end of the story.
NOTHING you can ever do can alter your chromosomal makeup. Every single cell of your body is still male if you're an XY. For your own sanity, what little of it there is left: you need to learn to accept and love yourself for who you are, instead of living a delusional lie and forcing your lie, selfishly and cruelly, onto everyone else.
Ever hear of enjoying sex fantasies in private? Give it a try.
Normal folks: You have no need or obligation to ever use any pronouns at all.
Never. They are always optional parts of speech. You can simply use the person's name, the "noun" for which the pronoun is intended as a substitute.
None of us gets to deny anyone else their chosen NAME. That one term, you do get the right to choose for yourself. But not your pronoun too. (Asserting a right does not actually confer that right.)
If John changes his name to Julie, then that's become
hisherJulie's NAME. I'll call Julie by Julie's chosen name, but not Julie's chosen pronouns. If Julie hates Julie's biological pronouns and I don't care to force the issue, I won't use any pronoun for Julie. And I won't call Julie John, because that's not Julie's name any more; same as if Miss Small marries Mr. Brown and takes the name Mrs. Brown, I'm not still calling her Miss Small. That would be rude.Just say NO to pronouns whenever you wish. It's always up to YOU.
The problem becomes when male babies are injected with complete set of chromosomes of a female and vise versa.
I'm obligated to point out that I personally know someone with XX Male Syndrome.
However, that is a DISORDER that affects 1 in 20,000 people--and I think it's far rarer.
It is XXY, a male with an extra X chromosome. Klinefelter syndrome.
No, it's not.
He's been genetically tested.
He's also my best friend.
I've known him for years.
He agrees with me on almost everything.
He has no reason to lie to me.
Oh my gosh, there is such a condition. I learn something new every day. Thx.https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/xx-male
What you say is not entirely true.
Think of it this way, imagine you have a plan to build a two storey house. You build the first storey. The bricks do not arrive on time for the second storey then the roofers come along any install the roof and the stair fitters do the best they can.
What have you built? A house or a bungalow?
Chromosomes are just a plan. It usually works out. Incidentally, everyone, as far as I know, has a full set of "female" chromosomes. All these people have XY chromosomes.
What the fuck was that homo promo jibber jabber? SECURITY!
I always get hassle when I tell the truth but it remains the truth nonetheless. Chromosomes are just a plan. That plan may work out as expected or it may not. Just like any plan. Hormones and nutrients need to be available at exactly the right times otherwise "failure" could result.
Also, it explains why hormone treatments and puberty blockers work well after birth. There is more to it than just chromosomes. That's before we get on to the people with XXY chromosomes and XYY etc.
All those people in the photograph would pass as female, yes, even undressed, even though they all have XY chromosomes.
Hmmm, pretty sure you're using the ol' "Let's find some rare outliers who might represent a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of 1% of the population" strategy as the basis for your argument.
Kinda like when folks are debating abortion and they immediately jump to the "But what about incest?" or "The mother could DIE!" arguments. Those rare cases represent a miniscule amount of the mostly "for convenience" abortions.
We're not going to craft laws that negatively impact 99.999% of the population based on the remote .001% outliers. That's ridiculous.
It was intended to be a house. Sure, something went wrong and it's now kind of a bungalow, more a less another dwelling. Just like when a woman can't reproduce. She's missing the "upstairs." She's still a woman. What if in your example, they decided to put wings on the side of the house and a cockpit upstairs is it now an airplane? That's a more apt comparison imo
Stopped reading at men and women are pretty much the same. You think you sound smart but you really don't
Yes, HUMAN BEINGS have all those physical characteristics but they are definitely different from each other.
Men and women are very different. Not just physically, either.
And to discount the physical differences as a result of them being minor, as you'd expect of two members of the same species might I add, is a worthless distinction.
When working within the frame of "human" we are very physically different. Just because we could work within the frame of "all species of all variations and differences" doesn't change that. And we should be working within the "human" frame, since that is what we are and what we are comparing/contrasting.
Androgen insensitivity syndrome
Yes genetically male