You have no idea. Why would I write some long format reply to someone who says there is no Tesla tech. You obviously have never researched the topic. If you had you would know there is definitely Tesla tech that has been suppressed as well as a host of other researchers and technologies that have been suppressed for decades in the name of national security. The Pentagon can block any patent and have it hidden, the tech itself be confiscated from the inventor, and have he or she forced to not talk about it publicly.
Of course I have no idea. That's why I asked you to instance ANY of it. You could even mention the Tesla turbine, but you don't (and that is not lost to anyone). I have read books on Tesla and followed him with interest, so what is "obvious" to you is a mistaken judgement. You should write a reply at least as long as the one you have written, to give your evidence of any such "tech." Or even name it. You won't do that because you can't do that. And you can't do that because there is no substance to the claim. (Death rays? That's my metier. And Tesla had nothing to do with them.)
And you have no idea, either. All you have is a paranoid myth that "there is something hidden." I don't live on belief; I live on evidence.
That's the problem with discussing "hidden" tech. There are plenty of myths though. The Pierce Arrow that Tesla apparently created that ran off of an AC motor that was powered wirelessly. Modern day they say it was a hoax however multiple different outlets show Tesla in his own writings saying he did in fact do this. Is it true? I have no idea but I bet there is truth in the story even if not exactly as told. Or the story of the wireless transmitter. Does it actually power thing wirelessly through the air? No it doesn't but that is common perception. There is an air component to it but it actually used to earth for the transmission of the power at least as I understand it. The reason it was a magnifying transmitter is because the telluric currents of the earth magnified the input power. This is why the Wardenclyff site was so important. It goes to the design and it functioned in the same fashion as the Pyramids according to Tesla.
The point is these are all things that can be "verified" if you do research but there is so much disinformation from modern times it is hard to say anything for sure.
Do I believe the FBI took all of his writings and then gave 100% of them back? No freaking way. They kept the really good stuff, high frequency/high voltage to themselves and were hidden as national security secrets. I say this because I have seen researchers make breakthroughs to then completely disappear and all their postings be deleted. Watched in real time regarding hydrogen power breakthroughs. Think Stan Meyer.
Now if you spend 10 years researching and doing your own experiments you may come to a similar conclusion as I did. Or you may come to a different conclusion. YMMV...
Exactly. Plenty of myths. Years ago, my company looked into the very interesting invention of Andrea Rossi called the "E-Cat." It might have been something, but it vanished into oblivion after a number of ambiguous demonstrations. How do you know any "Tesla tech" can be verified "if you do the research"? Have you done the research? Is there verification? What "hidden national security secrets"? Name just one. Or how do you know any exist? It is all myth.
Ok. Do you love your wife? Love your kids? Love your parents or siblings or whatever significant other you may have?
Prove it? Prove that love exists and that you feel it for them or that person.
There are a number of patents of carbeurators that get 100 MPG. All shelved by the oil companies or by the Government. That isn't a myth but there is verified record of this happening.
I built a Tesla wireless transmitter at home. Not to Tesla spec but using the same principles. It works. Why isn't the world running on this tech now?
It's all a myth? That's really where you want to go?
For obvious reasons I cannot show you hidden national security secrets so I ask you.
This is why criminals have to be proven guilty and they do not have to prove their innocence. For the exact argument that you are using. Stop it.
You have no idea. Why would I write some long format reply to someone who says there is no Tesla tech. You obviously have never researched the topic. If you had you would know there is definitely Tesla tech that has been suppressed as well as a host of other researchers and technologies that have been suppressed for decades in the name of national security. The Pentagon can block any patent and have it hidden, the tech itself be confiscated from the inventor, and have he or she forced to not talk about it publicly.
Of course I have no idea. That's why I asked you to instance ANY of it. You could even mention the Tesla turbine, but you don't (and that is not lost to anyone). I have read books on Tesla and followed him with interest, so what is "obvious" to you is a mistaken judgement. You should write a reply at least as long as the one you have written, to give your evidence of any such "tech." Or even name it. You won't do that because you can't do that. And you can't do that because there is no substance to the claim. (Death rays? That's my metier. And Tesla had nothing to do with them.)
And you have no idea, either. All you have is a paranoid myth that "there is something hidden." I don't live on belief; I live on evidence.
That's the problem with discussing "hidden" tech. There are plenty of myths though. The Pierce Arrow that Tesla apparently created that ran off of an AC motor that was powered wirelessly. Modern day they say it was a hoax however multiple different outlets show Tesla in his own writings saying he did in fact do this. Is it true? I have no idea but I bet there is truth in the story even if not exactly as told. Or the story of the wireless transmitter. Does it actually power thing wirelessly through the air? No it doesn't but that is common perception. There is an air component to it but it actually used to earth for the transmission of the power at least as I understand it. The reason it was a magnifying transmitter is because the telluric currents of the earth magnified the input power. This is why the Wardenclyff site was so important. It goes to the design and it functioned in the same fashion as the Pyramids according to Tesla.
The point is these are all things that can be "verified" if you do research but there is so much disinformation from modern times it is hard to say anything for sure.
Do I believe the FBI took all of his writings and then gave 100% of them back? No freaking way. They kept the really good stuff, high frequency/high voltage to themselves and were hidden as national security secrets. I say this because I have seen researchers make breakthroughs to then completely disappear and all their postings be deleted. Watched in real time regarding hydrogen power breakthroughs. Think Stan Meyer.
Now if you spend 10 years researching and doing your own experiments you may come to a similar conclusion as I did. Or you may come to a different conclusion. YMMV...
Exactly. Plenty of myths. Years ago, my company looked into the very interesting invention of Andrea Rossi called the "E-Cat." It might have been something, but it vanished into oblivion after a number of ambiguous demonstrations. How do you know any "Tesla tech" can be verified "if you do the research"? Have you done the research? Is there verification? What "hidden national security secrets"? Name just one. Or how do you know any exist? It is all myth.
Ok. Do you love your wife? Love your kids? Love your parents or siblings or whatever significant other you may have?
Prove it? Prove that love exists and that you feel it for them or that person.
There are a number of patents of carbeurators that get 100 MPG. All shelved by the oil companies or by the Government. That isn't a myth but there is verified record of this happening.
I built a Tesla wireless transmitter at home. Not to Tesla spec but using the same principles. It works. Why isn't the world running on this tech now?
It's all a myth? That's really where you want to go?
For obvious reasons I cannot show you hidden national security secrets so I ask you.
This is why criminals have to be proven guilty and they do not have to prove their innocence. For the exact argument that you are using. Stop it.