Ha! When I was in grad school in the 1970s, my professors (who were working in the area of thermonuclear fusion) told me that fusion power would always be 20 years away. That was because the DoE only funded it for the purpose of exploring fusion physics for the sake of better understanding how to design H-bombs. Here it is today, and nothing has changed, notwithstanding all the big experiments and bright ideas that seem to come to nothing. No government suppression. It is just a tough problem. So, yes, I do have some understanding of this.
The "disruptive technologies" arrive without being stopped. Notice they are not arriving for the Russians, or the French, or the Chinese, or the Israelis either. "Hydrogen splitting"? Are you referring to splitting the hydrogen from water molecules? A thermodynamic dead end, and will always be.
Your idea about industries is sheer myth. You don't like the idea that certain inventions are worthless, or that certain problems are wickedly difficult, because that would be too disappointing and depressing. Better to think that the Pot of Gold is being "hidden," because it keeps hope alive. Sorry, Charlie. Notice how SpaceX is putting NASA into eclipse? Shouldn't be happening, according to your mythology.
Makes more sense now. You are very set in your ways and because of your background will never have a mind open enough to see the other possibilities. Kind of like a normie to politics but from the science side. 20 years ago no one would believe the government was run by pedophiles and many still won't believe no matter how much evidence is put in front of them. Yet here we are.
Have you perused the Journal of Galilean Electrodynamics? Lots of alternatives to Einsteinian relativity. Have you read the work of Halton Arp ("Seeing Red")? Evidence of continual cosmic creation and a refutation of the argument for a Big Bang. Have you read the work of Frederick Kantor ("Information Mechanics")? A possible unification of quantum and relativity physics. No, I don't think you have even heard of these sources. Kind of like a normie to physics, but from the politics side.
So don't blow smoke at me about being "set in my ways" and "will never have a mind open enough." I was involved in the development of death rays, not Tesla.
Ha! When I was in grad school in the 1970s, my professors (who were working in the area of thermonuclear fusion) told me that fusion power would always be 20 years away. That was because the DoE only funded it for the purpose of exploring fusion physics for the sake of better understanding how to design H-bombs. Here it is today, and nothing has changed, notwithstanding all the big experiments and bright ideas that seem to come to nothing. No government suppression. It is just a tough problem. So, yes, I do have some understanding of this.
The "disruptive technologies" arrive without being stopped. Notice they are not arriving for the Russians, or the French, or the Chinese, or the Israelis either. "Hydrogen splitting"? Are you referring to splitting the hydrogen from water molecules? A thermodynamic dead end, and will always be.
Your idea about industries is sheer myth. You don't like the idea that certain inventions are worthless, or that certain problems are wickedly difficult, because that would be too disappointing and depressing. Better to think that the Pot of Gold is being "hidden," because it keeps hope alive. Sorry, Charlie. Notice how SpaceX is putting NASA into eclipse? Shouldn't be happening, according to your mythology.
Makes more sense now. You are very set in your ways and because of your background will never have a mind open enough to see the other possibilities. Kind of like a normie to politics but from the science side. 20 years ago no one would believe the government was run by pedophiles and many still won't believe no matter how much evidence is put in front of them. Yet here we are.
Have you perused the Journal of Galilean Electrodynamics? Lots of alternatives to Einsteinian relativity. Have you read the work of Halton Arp ("Seeing Red")? Evidence of continual cosmic creation and a refutation of the argument for a Big Bang. Have you read the work of Frederick Kantor ("Information Mechanics")? A possible unification of quantum and relativity physics. No, I don't think you have even heard of these sources. Kind of like a normie to physics, but from the politics side.
So don't blow smoke at me about being "set in my ways" and "will never have a mind open enough." I was involved in the development of death rays, not Tesla.