Canadian debunks Carbon Tax with simple math. Trees clean up far more carbon than everyone is producing.
(files.catbox.moe)
"The more you know!"
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
You said the CO2 is distributed evenly across the planet (it’s not, btw), so why would going to the equator change anything
Different plants require different conditions to thrive, hence why different areas have different plant life. There are many species of plants that do not survive as well with too much CO2
Oh my God. It's a gas. It's always moving, so yes, it's PRETTY even across the planet. The equator doesn't have any more or any less CO2 on average than the rest of the planet. That's not why plant life is so rich there. It's rich there because they have tons of direct sunlight, it's warm, and it's wet. The direct sunlight and warmth are a result of being on the fucking equator, and the wet is due to its geography. Drive to southern california sometime. You'll pass Vegas which is a dry desert, and in a few minutes you'll head over a mountain range that drops into California, where shit grows pretty much no matter what you do. Why? The clouds that form over the ocean hit those mountains, compress, drop rain all over southern california, and have very little left by the time they make it over the mountain range.
CO2 has nothing to do with anything except for the fact that without it, there would be no plants. But we have it, so there ARE plants.
Why is this hard?
I agree. That's why I was confused when the comment before seemed to use plant life on the equator as evidence that plants are always going to be fine with more CO2:
I already understand that plants use CO2 in the photosynthesis process to make glucose. However, what I am saying, and what evidence and observations have shown, is that in conditions with too much CO2, many plant species suffer.
Most plant species DON'T. So I don't really get what point you think you're making. Go to industrial greenhouses, they literally have machines that pump out extra CO2. You can cite as many New World Order articles as you like. Those who grow plants for a living know what works.
When you say most, is that just a guess? Do you have a figure in mind or are you just assuming?
I actually decided to look up some more articles on industrial greenhouses. They're all agreeing with me:
https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/greenhouse-carbon-dioxide-supplementation.html#:~:text=The%20ambient%20CO%202%20(naturally,at%20night%20in%20sealed%20greenhouses.
https://www.ontario.ca/page/supplemental-carbon-dioxide-greenhouses