The paper consent form sets the stage as a win for them. That’s why the did it. Proving coercion or duress is difficult but not impossible. I know a successful case where the defendant actually signed the confession “under duress “ in cursive just to be out of their hold. Dumb millennials don’t read cursive. The judge said he had to go with the documents and can’t chase stories of conspiracy. They asked the judge to read their signature and he dismissed the case immediately.
Either way, the entire legal system is gamed and rigged against the People, and primarily because of ignorance, we fail. There are people who know what is really the situation (re: law) here in Aus, and they are winning and winning.
Because in reality, "legal" does not = "lawful".
The point is not what sets the state for them, the real crux is the actual law. And when the People are ignorant of it, they are shafted. Ignorance is our greatest enemy in this battlefield.
The paper consent form sets the stage as a win for them. That’s why the did it. Proving coercion or duress is difficult but not impossible. I know a successful case where the defendant actually signed the confession “under duress “ in cursive just to be out of their hold. Dumb millennials don’t read cursive. The judge said he had to go with the documents and can’t chase stories of conspiracy. They asked the judge to read their signature and he dismissed the case immediately.
Where?
Are you talking about Australia, or the US?
Either way, the entire legal system is gamed and rigged against the People, and primarily because of ignorance, we fail. There are people who know what is really the situation (re: law) here in Aus, and they are winning and winning.
Because in reality, "legal" does not = "lawful".
The point is not what sets the state for them, the real crux is the actual law. And when the People are ignorant of it, they are shafted. Ignorance is our greatest enemy in this battlefield.