As long as there aren't enough number of people who sell goods and services in bitcoin, price fixed in bitcoin and not dollars (FERNs) bitcoin is not a way to full freedom. Think about it a little bit deeper and you will understand why.
Bitcoin was a great prototype to give people the taste of what freedom currency shall look like. But the real freedom currency cannot be any crypto that already exists. Why? Simple. Currency can never have first comer advantage. Thats cabal's way of doing things.
Another way to think about it: We dont want our grandkids to be disadvantaged just because they came in a few decades later. Thats what currency should be - just a denotion of value with no inherent advantage.
As long as there aren't enough number of people who sell goods and services in bitcoin, price fixed in bitcoin and not dollars (FERNs) bitcoin is not a way to full freedom. Think about it a little bit deeper and you will understand why.
Bitcoin was a great prototype to give people the taste of what freedom currency shall look like. But the real freedom currency cannot be any crypto that already exists. Why? Simple. Currency can never have first comer advantage. Thats cabal's way of doing things.
Another way to think about it: We dont want our grandkids to be disadvantaged just because they came in a few decades later. Thats what currency should be - just a denotion of value with no inherent advantage.
The same things you knock bitcoin for
Also apply to gold, silver, and almost any asset.
Exactly why I am not talking about assets but currencies.
The difference between assets and bitcoin… bitcoin can be near instantly transacted across the globe in under 30 seconds for just pennies in fees.
That, even if it were true (sadly it isn't from my own experience) has no relevance to the discussion we are having.