He wasn't talking about the twin towers, he was talking about other terrorist plots being planned. I'll grant it was symbolism and a double meaning but this won't redpill any normie will it? https://youtu.be/lSlH-MZ9J6M?t=220
The FIRST Video you reference, did you even bother to read the TITLE???
""President George W. Bush makes a statement on fifth anniverisary of the September 11 attacks""
That kinda says what he was speaking about, to, of, on, etc....
There was absolutely NO, Zero, None, nada, nothing, that could be considered a Freudian Slip....
As for the Second Video, yeah, that IS classic GW telling the truth, but this is still NOT a Freudian Slip, it's him actually telling the truth, like when he said something like ~~ Either you're with the Enemy, OR,(in other words) You're with us(The Enemy)....
Soo sorry that you cannot read him as easily as I do, but then, I have experience reading books that are One story, yet it has Two Titles....
They are ""Double Titled, as in::
Twist the Knife Slowly (A Murderer in the House) (1952)
Big Planet / The Slaves of The Klau
The Snows of Ganymede / War of the Wing-Men (1958)
There's even a so called Journalist from LA that wrote an entire column just to complain about Double Titles:: ""If Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) wins the Best Picture Oscar will we hear the whole title?""
What I'm saying is that what we hear from these shifty swindlers, is not normally what they might actually be saying, lots of the things they say can be much better understood as Comms, than actual Speeches, and lots of it is just an act....
And then some just aren't intelligent enough to hide their Comms within a speech, like Schumer, just way too dumb to do the Double Entendre, or even use Innuendo....
Sorry i don't mean to argue. I agree 100% with you that it's comms and Bush knows explosives were used in the twin towers, but no normie will believe he's talking about the twin towers as he referenced it was intel from Sheikh Mohammed about other terrorist attack plans.
And now, IF they can still read, IF they can still Comprehend, IF they still have the capacity to learn a little, this thread, our Communications here, will teach them some key things they need to learn in order to decipher the Comms from the criminal Cabal that's trying to take over the World as ""World Emperors""....
He wasn't talking about the twin towers, he was talking about other terrorist plots being planned. I'll grant it was symbolism and a double meaning but this won't redpill any normie will it? https://youtu.be/lSlH-MZ9J6M?t=220
This one is another good freudian slip. https://youtu.be/WRX8v_WjRGw?t=20
The FIRST Video you reference, did you even bother to read the TITLE???
""President George W. Bush makes a statement on fifth anniverisary of the September 11 attacks""
That kinda says what he was speaking about, to, of, on, etc....
There was absolutely NO, Zero, None, nada, nothing, that could be considered a Freudian Slip....
As for the Second Video, yeah, that IS classic GW telling the truth, but this is still NOT a Freudian Slip, it's him actually telling the truth, like when he said something like ~~ Either you're with the Enemy, OR,(in other words) You're with us(The Enemy)....
Soo sorry that you cannot read him as easily as I do, but then, I have experience reading books that are One story, yet it has Two Titles....
They are ""Double Titled, as in::
Twist the Knife Slowly (A Murderer in the House) (1952)
Big Planet / The Slaves of The Klau
The Snows of Ganymede / War of the Wing-Men (1958)
There's even a so called Journalist from LA that wrote an entire column just to complain about Double Titles:: ""If Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) wins the Best Picture Oscar will we hear the whole title?""
https://www.laweekly.com/stories-with-two-titles-or-why-people-should-maybe-just-make-up-their-minds/
What I'm saying is that what we hear from these shifty swindlers, is not normally what they might actually be saying, lots of the things they say can be much better understood as Comms, than actual Speeches, and lots of it is just an act....
And then some just aren't intelligent enough to hide their Comms within a speech, like Schumer, just way too dumb to do the Double Entendre, or even use Innuendo....
Sorry i don't mean to argue. I agree 100% with you that it's comms and Bush knows explosives were used in the twin towers, but no normie will believe he's talking about the twin towers as he referenced it was intel from Sheikh Mohammed about other terrorist attack plans.
GHWB
And now, IF they can still read, IF they can still Comprehend, IF they still have the capacity to learn a little, this thread, our Communications here, will teach them some key things they need to learn in order to decipher the Comms from the criminal Cabal that's trying to take over the World as ""World Emperors""....
Thanks for helping....