5G radiation not thermal effects causing health issues
(www.theepochtimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Paywall.
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theepochtimes.com%2Fhealth%2Frecent-case-of-severe-microwave-syndrome-reveals-problems-with-5g_5221534.html%3Fautoemail%3Dlhbravo%2540mac.com%26utm_source%3Ddeployer%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_content%3D%26utm_campaign%3Droundup%26utm_term%3D
Still vague. Milliwatts/meter2 outside a window? But what was it inside the window? What is the threshold for effects? If 5G is a beam-forming system, why is this person receiving any signal power? Something being "exponentially" larger than something else is glitter-speak, not anything technically meaningful.
But there are legitimate questions. Distinct differences in discomfort when shifting rooms. Puzzling radiation in the bathroom (how did it get there?). Symptoms of the dog. I think screening material as an applique of wire grid with 2-millimeter spacing would probably block the radiation. Might be better to provide a solution than fight uphill.
Perhaps they have a 5G IOT connected device sitting in their house and they spend time in the beam. Maybe they are walking round with a 5G phone in their pocket and listening to podcasts. Beamforming would stretch out the inverse square law some. I heard you can shine a coherent laser onto the moon and detect it's reflection if it properly collimated.
Beamforming doesn't really "stretch out" the inverse square law; it still prevails in the far field. In the near field, the beam is closer to the area of the antenna. Optical systems have smaller beamspread because of smaller wavelength.
I thought of an angle on this. It may be there is no particular problem with the carrier wave. But the wave is modulated in digital bursts. I began to wonder if this results in the same effect as amplitude modulation on a carrier wave. Basically, the resulting waveform is the carrier plus the modulation. If something similar is going on with the digital signal, it could be "as though" a second waveform is superposed on the carrier. The victims could be responding to that second waveform, which would be at a much lower frequency than the carrier. (This is the point where a radio communications engineer should comment.)