Thanks for the lesson I didn't need. Not sure where that came from.
My point was if we moved the govt to TX the govt workers wouldn't be so cavalier about the border.
If you are saying there wouldn't be enough govt workers to matter, then maybe you should look into that. While almost all of the govt is unconstitutional, some is not. Things like CONgress, the executive office, the USPS, the mint, the treasury, the military hq, supreme court, state department, a commerce department, a patent office, an immigration service, courts under the supreme court, a tax/tariff office - I think I got most of them in the actual Constitution. More may be in the amendments, but these services/duties are in the main articles.
Note some of these could easily be combined into fewer agencies but these things are all required. Things like the Bureau of Indian Affairs belongs in the State Dept as just another office - not on it's own. A justice department could be argued either way - on one hand it is not explicitly called out, but on the other hand the Constitution does say "he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" as a duty for the President. Since he is also called out as the Commander in Chief but not required to actually fight wars (so he has a defense department) it would be reasonable to assume the same for law enforcement. I don't think any federal police service is constitutional, but the argument is there.
Personally I would love to see all of the unconstitutional agencies defunded and shut down. Some of them were even chartered by executive order. The FBI may or may not have been one of those. Teddy Roosevelt asked CONgress to create a federal investigative agency in 1907 and they refused. In 1908 either Teddy created it, or the AG created it, but either way it is not constitutional. It was however named in EO 6166 in 1933 (what is it with these Roosevelts?), so that infers that it could be struck down as well since a President can (and does) negate other EOs.
Regardless, there will always be government workers as long as America survives. It should never number in the millions, but it will require a fair amount of people in proportion the the work and population.
You underestimate how many Mexicans now live in Texas. They are out breeding the native Tex population. At the border its a situation of foxes guarding the hen house
I got your point. But, yes, you and most of America need that information. There is a process that is going on, early stages, to educate our state legislators about their real duties, responsibilities and powers that the fed gov stole from them long ago. None of the 3-letter agencies are legitimate. You might know that if you were digging on that. Almost no one is. G.R. Mobely is doing just that: reclaimingtherepublic.org
Thanks for the lesson I didn't need. Not sure where that came from.
My point was if we moved the govt to TX the govt workers wouldn't be so cavalier about the border.
If you are saying there wouldn't be enough govt workers to matter, then maybe you should look into that. While almost all of the govt is unconstitutional, some is not. Things like CONgress, the executive office, the USPS, the mint, the treasury, the military hq, supreme court, state department, a commerce department, a patent office, an immigration service, courts under the supreme court, a tax/tariff office - I think I got most of them in the actual Constitution. More may be in the amendments, but these services/duties are in the main articles.
Note some of these could easily be combined into fewer agencies but these things are all required. Things like the Bureau of Indian Affairs belongs in the State Dept as just another office - not on it's own. A justice department could be argued either way - on one hand it is not explicitly called out, but on the other hand the Constitution does say "he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" as a duty for the President. Since he is also called out as the Commander in Chief but not required to actually fight wars (so he has a defense department) it would be reasonable to assume the same for law enforcement. I don't think any federal police service is constitutional, but the argument is there.
Personally I would love to see all of the unconstitutional agencies defunded and shut down. Some of them were even chartered by executive order. The FBI may or may not have been one of those. Teddy Roosevelt asked CONgress to create a federal investigative agency in 1907 and they refused. In 1908 either Teddy created it, or the AG created it, but either way it is not constitutional. It was however named in EO 6166 in 1933 (what is it with these Roosevelts?), so that infers that it could be struck down as well since a President can (and does) negate other EOs.
Regardless, there will always be government workers as long as America survives. It should never number in the millions, but it will require a fair amount of people in proportion the the work and population.
You underestimate how many Mexicans now live in Texas. They are out breeding the native Tex population. At the border its a situation of foxes guarding the hen house
I live in Texas. I don't underestimate it.
I got your point. But, yes, you and most of America need that information. There is a process that is going on, early stages, to educate our state legislators about their real duties, responsibilities and powers that the fed gov stole from them long ago. None of the 3-letter agencies are legitimate. You might know that if you were digging on that. Almost no one is. G.R. Mobely is doing just that: reclaimingtherepublic.org