Part 3: Structure of the Constitutional Republic > 50 Sovereign State with Article IV, Section 4 guarantees
(media.greatawakening.win)
CONSTITUTIONAL WARFARE
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Who enforces the law when everyone refuses to follow it? The answer appears to be the individuals [LEFT SIDE] OR the military [RIGHT SIDE], not necessarily in that order, when the Sovereign States have either been usurped or co-opted by Commie Governors and legislatures. In the very [CENTER] each State Assembly needs to re-take control one state at a time, county-by-county.
Deep State is attempting to neutralize State General Assemblies by bribing and co-opting members who are elected via rigged elections, and then using Commie Governors to veto anything they cannot stop in the General Assembly.
Note the following costs for Individuals suing in Federal Court over Constitutional violations: $402 filing fee Federal District Court, $505 filing fee Circuit Court/Appeals Court (also same cost for Writ of Mandamus instructing a State Judge, Legislator, or Executive to resign or face court-ordered arrest for contempt).
"The law" of the land was (de facto) officially extinguished in 1938 when TPTSB merged common law and equity into their now "in rem" jurisdiction known as "The rules of civil procedure" providing them unfettered power to do whatever they want with zero accountability under the man-made, fictional entity governing "legal" system.
I think most of the rules for civil procedure are actually unconstitutional per Congress "oversight" and review/approval/interference with the rules creation process which is supposed to be SCOTUS alone. All made possible by parts of FAILED Judicial Act of 1937 which likely violates Separation of Powers doctrine among other things.
They sure are as they apply only to fictional (dead) entities (your ALL CAPS NAME strawman trust) under the UCC and corpus juris secundum. The word "Civil" is the "tell".
Civil, i.e., law of the city as opposed to law of the land.