Yes and no. BTC has changed but Satoshi knew that would happen.
Remember, btc isn‘t the answer, but just a disruptive step away from centralized control and separates money from State.
Consider the bitcoin whitepaper the constitution of Bitcoin. BTC does not follow it even one bit any more. Marxists have taken it over. Just look at BlockStream (double meaning), and the blue haired fucker and his team that subverted the control over the bitcoin repo.
I get the arguments but Satoshi never said anything about the forks.
For sure BTC has become a store of value and not a currency. Slick bad guys and I agree with you re Blockstream (and name! LOL), Marxists taking it over, etc.
We can just use BCH but CBDC‘s are coming ro the rescue! /s
Yes and no. BTC has changed but Satoshi knew that would happen. Remember, btc isn‘t the answer, but just a disruptive step away from centralized control and separates money from State.
Consider the bitcoin whitepaper the constitution of Bitcoin. BTC does not follow it even one bit any more. Marxists have taken it over. Just look at BlockStream (double meaning), and the blue haired fucker and his team that subverted the control over the bitcoin repo.
I get the arguments but Satoshi never said anything about the forks. For sure BTC has become a store of value and not a currency. Slick bad guys and I agree with you re Blockstream (and name! LOL), Marxists taking it over, etc.
We can just use BCH but CBDC‘s are coming ro the rescue! /s
https://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/485/
This suggestion would require a fork :)
Agreed! I wish they would have increased the block size a while ago, but they want lightening.