If We’re Nuked...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (75)
sorted by:
The damage would be equivalent to size, type and source of fission or fusion. The detonation would be equivalent of the result of contributing mechanisms of the device. There is no containment of that. Nuclear fallout (winter) would be equivalent of the blast radius and atmospheric release coupled by the by product isotopes and isotope reaction of the radioactive material used for fission/fusion, causing the detonation. This would be devastating to localized area upward of 100 miles or more. Its not even a case to discuss or debate whether the damage would be limited. Essentially 1 to 5 miles of ground level within the radius of detonation would be vaporized and virtually uninhabitable of nearly any living organism. I would consider that far beyond damage and in the category of absolute. If you are within those parameters the only god that is in control at that point is the outcome of physics and the one you decided to pray to in your brain before it is wiped from existence.
what? nuclear fallout is NOT the same as nuclear winter. nuclear fallout has been experienced by many inhabited places.
yes, the size of explosion depends on the device. yes, any amount of nuclear damage is a tragedy. but we have endured tragedy. losing a town does not mean losing the continent.
a boom on our soil doesn't mean we give up. and I doubt even a single detonation of that size will be allowed to take place.
i was an atheist for a long time. its not about beginning to believe in the concept of God, but rather beginning to understand it. there are no accidents within God. and everything is within God.
lol OK. 1 is an event, the other is theoretical sequence event causal to the origination. Anyway I responded to your comment that if there was a detonation it would be contained and then that the damage would be limited, which wasnt accurate. Cheers.