The combustion of hydrogen produces water. Water causes Climate Change. Proof: every single time it rains the climate changes. Water is the MOST IMPORTANT molecule involved in Climate Change.
In addition, burning hydrogen causes heat to be released, thus contributing to global warming. When the sun burns hydrogen it causes gamma ray radiation, thus the better we get at using hydrogen for fuel, the more it destroys our environment.
ON TOP OF ALL THAT, just like with fossil fuels, there is only a limited amount of Hydrogen in the universe. It is estimated that only 99% of all visible matter is hydrogen and it is only going down as stars burn it for fuel. It is not a renewable resource. Once it's all gone, our entire universe will die. Using it for fuel will destroy all life, forever.
Pushing hydrogen combustion against EV's is evil, and will cause us to lose not just our planet, but the entire universe, probably by 2030.
Unironically the water could be a problem if scaled up enough.
I remember one of the lectures by the head of Greenpeace saying that heat is more easily trapped in humid/moist areas. Which they carried out studies on.
Then they will blame water as the source for climate change hysteria and impose restrictions on water access
If they can sell CO2 as the "bad molecule" when it is one of the most important molecules for life on earth, with numerous methods of natural regulation, including increasing plant life, which increases oxygen, which increase animal life, etc., then they can easily sell H2O as a "bad molecule" and impose a "water tax."
That water tax would be devastating for the Eskimos who build their homes out of it, but I guess it's just a round about way of selling them their own ice. We may have hit on the overarching motivation for their evil plan. Selling ice to Eskimos!
It should read like satire. Satire often employs strawman arguments, but not all strawman arguments are satire. Thus, if you appreciate the strawman arguments, but not the satire, you are not appreciating the argument for what it is in it's entirety, but rather, what it is in part, which is itself something of a strawman.
The satire of The Bee is oddly predictive these days of bizzaro sound/visual bites. OTH, some MSM headlines I've seen here defy the definition of satire. Tongue in cheek is the cheeky now.
The combustion of hydrogen produces water. Water causes Climate Change. Proof: every single time it rains the climate changes. Water is the MOST IMPORTANT molecule involved in Climate Change.
In addition, burning hydrogen causes heat to be released, thus contributing to global warming. When the sun burns hydrogen it causes gamma ray radiation, thus the better we get at using hydrogen for fuel, the more it destroys our environment.
ON TOP OF ALL THAT, just like with fossil fuels, there is only a limited amount of Hydrogen in the universe. It is estimated that only 99% of all visible matter is hydrogen and it is only going down as stars burn it for fuel. It is not a renewable resource. Once it's all gone, our entire universe will die. Using it for fuel will destroy all life, forever.
Pushing hydrogen combustion against EV's is evil, and will cause us to lose not just our planet, but the entire universe, probably by 2030.
TRUST THE SCIENCE!!
Kek!
Well, then, a big thumbs up for a ride anywhere, and make sure you have a towel...
😁
And remember, Don't Panic
Unironically the water could be a problem if scaled up enough.
I remember one of the lectures by the head of Greenpeace saying that heat is more easily trapped in humid/moist areas. Which they carried out studies on.
Then they will blame water as the source for climate change hysteria and impose restrictions on water access
If they can sell CO2 as the "bad molecule" when it is one of the most important molecules for life on earth, with numerous methods of natural regulation, including increasing plant life, which increases oxygen, which increase animal life, etc., then they can easily sell H2O as a "bad molecule" and impose a "water tax."
That water tax would be devastating for the Eskimos who build their homes out of it, but I guess it's just a round about way of selling them their own ice. We may have hit on the overarching motivation for their evil plan. Selling ice to Eskimos!
Water tax then sell ice back to the Eskimos... What a genius idea!
Way to haul us all down Debbie….Geez. /s
This reads like a strawman argument
It should read like satire. Satire often employs strawman arguments, but not all strawman arguments are satire. Thus, if you appreciate the strawman arguments, but not the satire, you are not appreciating the argument for what it is in it's entirety, but rather, what it is in part, which is itself something of a strawman.
:)
The satire of The Bee is oddly predictive these days of bizzaro sound/visual bites. OTH, some MSM headlines I've seen here defy the definition of satire. Tongue in cheek is the cheeky now.