What article is Q referring to?
I think he is referring the Article 1 Section 9 Clause 2.
"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
Some historians trace the writ back to Magna Charta, although more definitive evidence shows a gradual emergence under the common law, culminating in the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, during the reign of Charles II. As Hamilton’s comment shows, the Framers were well aware of the writ. Note that the Constitution does not “create” the writ; rather, Article I, Section 9, assumes the existence of the writ, but provides for its limited suspension.
Early in the Civil War, President Lincoln suspended the writ in a portion of Maryland to arrest a secessionist for destroying railroad bridges.
Chief Justice, Merryman, denounced Lincoln’s action, arguing that only Congress could suspend the writ.
(The next paragraph explains what conditions must present itself)
In classic implied executive powers fashion, Lincoln responded that the Constitution did not specify which branch could suspend the writ, only the conditions under which it could be suspended. Moreover, the President could act due to the emergency involved. Both Lincoln and his attorney general, Edward Bates, declared that the judiciary was incapable of dealing adequately with organized rebellion. Bates, in his more detailed opinion, pointedly reminded the Court that the executive was not subordinate to the judiciary, but one of three coordinate branches of government. The President took an oath to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution,” Bates asserted, and the courts were too weak to accomplish that task.
What is being shown today?
FBI, CIA, DOJ and the courts are all corrupt / weak.
Just recently shown that FBI and DOJ posses a form FD-1023 from a whistle blower that explains criminal activity where Biden is taking money for foreign political decisions. The FBI and DOJ did not investigate.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b64Drlmr/congress-to-the-doj-and-fbi--it-/c/
Also recently revealed, the CIA assassinated JFK and was involved in the 9/11 plot.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1651650776408948736.html
Courts refused to look at the election fraud.
At some point in the near future the safety of the American people will be threatened. What will the threat be? Expiration of title 42? Bank Collapse? Nuclear threat/WW3? Perhaps a combination of all 3 scenarios? It will look like the country is on the brink of destruction.
Expiration of Title 42 is going to create a invasion, what does the Writ say?
Could we trust the FBI, CIA and DOJ to resolve all these dilemmas, protect our country and the American people? Nope!!!
If we went into a Devolution of government power or Trump signed the Insurrection Act, the military could secretly be in control and we may not realize it. Trump would have handed the military the control as a way to protect the Constitution and the American people. Biden may be the fake president through election fraud but Trump would remain Commander in Chief (CIC). This would explain the disrespect to Biden from the military on his Inauguration day.
This touches back on the DOD Law of War manual and struggle we have witnessed between the belligerent occupying power (Biden) and (Trump) as the CIC of the occupied territory. (White hat vs Black hat)
Trump is controlling our military and when Trump decides to suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus, the storm has arrived. I have heard the military tribunals will take place in June and July. This will be when the black hats will need to appear for their court date in GITMO.
Stay safe my frens!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
No. The Posse Comitatus Act forbids the use of the military from regular civil law enforcement. Habeas Corpus is a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court order the custodian of the person, usually a prison official, to bring the prisoner to court, to determine whether the detention is lawful.
Yes, you are correct. I removed that sentence,
I read the first paragraph in the link I provided and interpreted it to say the Writ prevented the government (or its military being that Lincoln was the CIC) from growing out of control and becoming a engine to confine and jail persons, thus limiting military intervention on American soil.
"Alexander Hamilton, writing in Federalist 84, approvingly quotes Blackstone that habeas corpus is the “ bulwark of the British constitution,” in that it prevents the “dangerous engine of arbitrary government” that comes from “confinement of the person, by secretly hurrying him to jail, where his sufferings are unknown or forgotten.”
However, I mentioned later in the post if Trump signed the Insurrection Act:
The Insurrection Act
"If the president truly wants to deploy U.S. soldiers to “dominate the streets” in cities around the country as he threatened in his June 1 remarks, he will need to go beyond the authorities discussed above and invoke perhaps the most significant exception to posse comitatus restrictions on the books: the Insurrection Act."
Originally enacted in 1807 and modeled on similar statutes dating back to the beginning of the republic, the Insurrection Act—which is now codified as amended at 10 U.S.C. Ch. 13—operationalizes the authority “[t]o provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” provided to Congress by the Constitution’s Militia Clauses. Specifically, it authorizes the president to deploy both active-duty military and federalized National Guard members to address situations of civil unrest in the country, provided that certain conditions are met."
https://www.lawfareblog.com/can-trump-use-insurrection-act-deploy-troops-american-streets
The article says there are conditions that must be met:
"The president cannot invoke the Insurrection Act secretly or ambiguously. Before doing so, he is required to make a public proclamation directing “the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time,”
President Trump tells rioters at Capitol to 'go home'
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/01/06/donald-trump-go-home-message-rioters-jake-tapper-vpx.cnn
In essence, all of the conditions for suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus, posse comitatus and invoking the Insurrection Act have been met.
TY fren. You wrote: "The president cannot invoke the Insurrection Act secretly or ambiguously. Before doing so, he is required to make a public proclamation directing “the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time,” and TY for the CNN clip where he tells people to retire peacefully in their homes, as in the last part of that
but according to the first part: "The president cannot invoke the Insurrection Act secretly or ambiguously...." Where does he do this? If it's not secretly then we should be able to see that he did no in a nonambiguous way. I realize the "media" is in cahoots with the enemy and may not have broadcast it but is there some presidential record after Jan 6th where he enacted it?
I look at this and assume the only prerequisite required from Trump before signing the Insurrection Act is that he tell the rioters/insurgents to return to their homes. I remember when this happened it was immediately understood what just took place. It was understood where Trump was going next by making this statement.
When Trump performed the only requirement, it should be expected what his next move will be. If the MSM refused to question Trump and/or inform the people what may have just happened, thats is on them. Trump doesn't have to inform his enemies what his next move is.