I did not say, nor did I intend, that we are speaking of the same covenant that existed between God and Israel. I meant that the US also made a covenant of sorts with God when they landed - it is akin to a vow/covenant. Therefore, the US would be held to the parameters and conditions of a covenantal relationship with God. Meaning, if you break it, you suffer the consequences.
Let us be clear... Jesus, his disciples, and the rest of his audience were all Jews with the exception of the Samarians and a few God fearing Gentiles, like the Centurion. Jesus interacted with those considered as Jews in the context of the time. Israel and Jewish were interchangeable terms in that day and not up for debate as it seems to be the case now. Even Paul, as well as the rest of the NT writers, made a clear distinction between who was a Jew/Israel, and who was not - the Gentiles. There was no question in their minds, so why does it have to be a question today? The Jews of Jesus' day never gave a thought to whether Jewish originated as a term for those from Judea. That argument had no meaning for them. Anyone that tries to read into these distinctions something other that how they were meant to be understood in their historical and cultural context is adding meaning not intended by the writers.
I never said you were, I'm am - if you look at the Greek and Hebrew with lexicons and other writings of the time it's quite clear. Judean is the real word, and due to Edomites flooding Judea after the Assyrian deportations, it's merely a geographical identifier, though Christ could tell the wheat from the tears, unlike the apostles. "One among you is a devil" - what group behaves the same as Judas Iscariot? Should be obvious.
The people we call jews today are "those that say they are Judeans and are not" and they have the same behavior as their ancestors that killed our God come in the flesh as Christ. Goyim means nations, and in context, only refers to the other Israelite nations scattered by the Assyrian deportation. The KJV has many translation errors, including adding universalist language in Paul's writings.
The people of the USA, only the pure Whites, were already under God's covenant, so of course OP's pic is applicable to us, same as all pure Whites around the world.
The Bible isn't archetypal, it's the history of our people, and it's been hijacked by the Edomites of today. You can't make up a new covenant without it being in there, as there are no more prophets. It's blasphemy to do so.
You are right - Judean was a geographic identifier. However, the word Ἰουδαῖος means Jewish or Jew. There is a difference. Jews from Galilee were Galileans but they were still Jewish. This is the same for any Jew no matter where they lived in Israel, or the rest of the world. When people finally stop making this about race they will start to come much closer to the truth.
No one was called a jew at that time, it was Judean. All the conflicts of the Bible come from our own lack of knowledge, and when you use that methodology I described earlier, you realize it's all about race, and every conflict disappears.
I did not say, nor did I intend, that we are speaking of the same covenant that existed between God and Israel. I meant that the US also made a covenant of sorts with God when they landed - it is akin to a vow/covenant. Therefore, the US would be held to the parameters and conditions of a covenantal relationship with God. Meaning, if you break it, you suffer the consequences.
Let us be clear... Jesus, his disciples, and the rest of his audience were all Jews with the exception of the Samarians and a few God fearing Gentiles, like the Centurion. Jesus interacted with those considered as Jews in the context of the time. Israel and Jewish were interchangeable terms in that day and not up for debate as it seems to be the case now. Even Paul, as well as the rest of the NT writers, made a clear distinction between who was a Jew/Israel, and who was not - the Gentiles. There was no question in their minds, so why does it have to be a question today? The Jews of Jesus' day never gave a thought to whether Jewish originated as a term for those from Judea. That argument had no meaning for them. Anyone that tries to read into these distinctions something other that how they were meant to be understood in their historical and cultural context is adding meaning not intended by the writers.
I never said you were, I'm am - if you look at the Greek and Hebrew with lexicons and other writings of the time it's quite clear. Judean is the real word, and due to Edomites flooding Judea after the Assyrian deportations, it's merely a geographical identifier, though Christ could tell the wheat from the tears, unlike the apostles. "One among you is a devil" - what group behaves the same as Judas Iscariot? Should be obvious.
The people we call jews today are "those that say they are Judeans and are not" and they have the same behavior as their ancestors that killed our God come in the flesh as Christ. Goyim means nations, and in context, only refers to the other Israelite nations scattered by the Assyrian deportation. The KJV has many translation errors, including adding universalist language in Paul's writings.
The people of the USA, only the pure Whites, were already under God's covenant, so of course OP's pic is applicable to us, same as all pure Whites around the world.
The Bible isn't archetypal, it's the history of our people, and it's been hijacked by the Edomites of today. You can't make up a new covenant without it being in there, as there are no more prophets. It's blasphemy to do so.
You are right - Judean was a geographic identifier. However, the word Ἰουδαῖος means Jewish or Jew. There is a difference. Jews from Galilee were Galileans but they were still Jewish. This is the same for any Jew no matter where they lived in Israel, or the rest of the world. When people finally stop making this about race they will start to come much closer to the truth.
No one was called a jew at that time, it was Judean. All the conflicts of the Bible come from our own lack of knowledge, and when you use that methodology I described earlier, you realize it's all about race, and every conflict disappears.