Very subtle vaccine trial debunk, great to share with normies
(www.skepticalraptor.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Doesn't look to me at all like it debunks anything, and I'm having trouble getting past the arrogance of the author.
Granted, I'm not "practiced" enough to be able to assess this sort of content, so how would this truly be a good "red pill" for "normies"? If anything it appears to reinforce the pro-vax standpoint pretty aggressively, and any "normies" won't be discerning enough to pick up on what you pointed out.
Yes but consider how it's being reinforced: name calling, appeals to authority, etc.
Count up the logical arguments in favor of the process in this article and I think you'll come to zero.
Meanwhile, consider all the factual information you've absorbed about the trial stages after reading this.
It's very subtle. One of the most brilliant works I've seen. Don't be out off by the aggressiveness, that's what will allow a brainwashed person to read it.
Their mind has to be "lubed up" with pro-vaxx rhetoric.
I think the arrogance is intentional. Talking like them then highlighting the holes in their argument.
But I don't really like this type of thing. I haven't met people who have actually studied it and agree with the vax science. Most pro vax people just believe their doctor or say it's the thing we always do. So I don't know who I would send it to.