This morning I had an awesome text exchange with my band of “awake-brothers”. It was too interesting not to share. Here is the Cliffs notes version: Over the last several months our guy Tucker C has been firing massive red-pills about all the shit no one else in “main-stream media” will. Ukraine, Vaccine fukery, China, Biden crime shit, … you name it. Its almost as if he has been TRYING to get fired. He interviews MUSK, then TRUMP! Same week. WHO DOES THAT??? The absolute King of the Truth Tellers. Sure enough, FIRED (or maybe more appropriately phyzered). Now, the single most popular “News” personality is a ‘Free Agent’ (sort of). OK, so he likely has a non-compete clause if some kind. As some have pointed out here, “social media” does not likely fall into that non-grata (I wish I could recall which genius anon here pointed that out … fuk. Credit to you fren, not me). NOW, TC is rearming his red-pill artillery cannon on Twitter. Remember people clowning Elon about over paying for Twitter? When Tucker, OKeefe, and all the REAL journos are reporting fromTwitter, with HUNDREDS of millions across the globe ‘tuning in’, what kind of value would Twitter then have? What would it be valued at FINANCIALLY, with that kind of Ad reach? Elon could take Twitter 2.0 public (make it a publicly traded company again) and in less than 48 hours get back 3 times what he paid for it.
Enjoy your daily thought grenade. 🤣
Remember that all the social media companies have been hiding behind Section 230 to escape liability of criminal content since it says they are not publishers.
Courts have recognized this, which means the courts also recognize the socials do not compete in the same arena as cable news. Different arena, so a no-compete clause does not apply to Twitter.
The DS would either have to give up the section 230 protections or allow Tucker to drop redpill MOAB's on normies.
Excellent point on section 230.
Damn … thats next level autism. Thats on point. Awesome comment. POWER Updoot for you also!!!