Neither You or I Are A “person” https://www.craftylifestyle.co.uk/uploads/2/3/2/8/23282466/neither_you_or_i_are_a_person.pdf
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
Me either. The only other times I've seen this argument made have been on episodes of Court Cam & it's always a toothless hillbilly methhead arguing it in a kangaroo court.
This will happen because people don't really know their stuff. Because such people don't know their stuff, they go about everything in the wrong way. They try to play the game in terms that don't actually come under the jurisdiction of the law courts, and so they get owned by the system.
When engaging with the law courts, one has to know very, very clearly what their jurisdiction is, and what it isn't, and know where you stand in that context.
There are so many starting points in this rabbit warren (a rabbit warren is an interconnected network of rabbit holes), it's hard to begin. You'll find pieces that make no sense, that seem to contradiction, that appear meaningless gobbledygook, but that is by design.
The Cabal was people to know about this are LESS than they want people to know about human and child trafficking. Because even if one knows the corruption exists, you can only directly fight with them if you know HOW they control you.
I know what you mean! Apparently they think there is some sort of magic phrasing that if you just say something that sounds sort of legal, there's a loophole that the courts have to give you to get out of trouble. It's just stupid.
You'd think that they would catch on when everyone using this stuff loses their case. Case after case, year after year with none of this silliness ever working like they want it too.
Why is it that every fringe dweller on the outskirts of civilization want to dump their issues onto Q? Like this is the dumpyard where everything outside mainstream sheeple beliefs go to die.
Doesn't David Icke have a forum for these people?