Neither You or I Are A “person” https://www.craftylifestyle.co.uk/uploads/2/3/2/8/23282466/neither_you_or_i_are_a_person.pdf
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
That's because people who don't really know their stuff engage with it in the wrong way, and they end up simply getting owned by the system. They try to play the game in terms that don't actually come under the jurisdiction of the law courts.
When engaging with the law courts, one has to know very, very clearly what their jurisdiction is, and what it isn't, and know where you stand in that context.
By the way, think of the expression "sovereign citizen" in the same way you think of "conspiracy theory", and you'll start to grasp what is going on.
Great post. One thing to also keep in mind is Judges that are corrupt and will not follow the law. Same for prosecutors, etc. I have personally witnessed someone get convicted by a jury that was influenced and controlled by the judge. This person had no attorney, and the judge told him if he let the jury know he was being tried without an attorney against his will that he would be put away for the rest of his life. He was not allowed to present his evidence, and was unable to give any jury instructions. He was also told if he appealed he would be dealt with.
This was about 10 years ago, and it has gotten a lot worse today. Most courts are corrupt and you will not likely find a fair trial or any justice within a courtroom today.
Could you give me the name of a case where someone using the tactics you've described have won their case because of them?
Okay, but could you first define "win"?
In a court case? You want me to define for you what a win is in a court case?
Ok, let's see. We'll assume the person using Sovereign tactics is a defendant. So if they plead not guilty of whatever they're charged with, and their use of Sovereign whatever results in the court finding them not guilty, that's a win.
No. I want you to clarify how YOU define "win" in this context. I don't want you to do anything for me, but thanks for the offer.
Would you consider a case being dismissed as a win?
Or a case being put into limbo for 5+ years?
Is being found "not guilty" under a system that is corrupt or which exerts jurisdiction by fraud a win? In many cases, I would say no. It merely perpetuates the system, and the individual is still controlled by it.
To even begin looking at this question, you need to be able to understand the difference between "legal" and "lawful". Can you explain the difference to me?