Not because Linda is the new James Woods or anything . . . but because every woke, pro-tyranny, WEF-supporting thing she says or does will be analyzed, torn apart, and commented on by sane people on and off Twitter itself.
You know how Trump puts people in the spotlight so they can show the normies how (evil, corrupt, stupid, whatever) they really are?
^This.
Linda Yaccarino will be posting on Twitter (not just "running" it) -- where Tucker and James Woods and Elon himself and thousands of other sane, non-Woke people will also be posting and, in some cases, hosting actual shows -- like Tucker's.
Putting Linda in the CEO spot will probably encourage lefties to stay at or move to Twitter, but with Musk's insistence that conservatives be allowed to speak, things won't go as they did before at Twitter.
She will be increasingly seen, by millions including by current normies and lefties, to be exactly as Woke-headed and pro-tyranny and harmful as she really is. And in turn, Wokeness itself will be seen for what IT is, as will tyranny in general. "Care for another Red-Pill, sir or madam?"
I'm not worried about her becoming CEO at all; Musk will still own Twitter and be involved as executive chair and chief technology officer. I don't expect Twitter to devolve back into a cringe-worthy hellscape of censorship and Wokeness; I expect any censorship and Wokeness to be eviscerated by people who are sane and compassionate and actually awake to reality, and for that to help build the avalanche of awakening we have already begun.
This is just another brilliant move by Elon and the White Hats, IMO.
If I'm wrong . . . well, shite happens. But I don't think it'll go that way.
Because he bought twitter & exposed the censorship at a time when free speech was at an all time low. Period. No one who was part of the agenda of getting us all vaxed up would have done that. The black hats made it impossible for us to even reach normies. Why would another black hat on the same team all of a sudden let there be a route for this to happen? You know? If the enemy has the us surrounded then why would one of their captains give us an escape route? Why?
That proves to me that he's on our side. Yes, you could argue that he's a lone actor trying the seize an opportunity. That is a reasonable assumption but even that is unlikely. It's less likely because it's more complicated. It's a twisted idea that he's risking 40 billion - half of which he already lost - in order to somehow make shitloads more down the line. What makes the most sense is that he saw the future of humanity in peril & knew he could do something to possibly stop that. OR he's been on the white hat team all along. It's got to be one of those 2.
I would, of course, have loved to have Don Jr as CEO but then the normies might really leave. He needs to bring in someone that at least appears to be more like one of them
I disagree, it is not lockstep for the reasons I wrote. At worst, he could maybe be trying to get a larger hunk of power from the cabal by challenging them. That's it but I don't think it's even that because he does live interviews & speaks on the spot, like Trump does. Cabal rats need to have preset things to say.
Besides the fact that anything is always possible why do you think he has the mental slack to be that complicated while on the spot? Musk's brilliance is in business & inventing not acting.