Azov...Azoth? Is this the Ideology behind the infamous Battalion?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Cabal History
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Likely is the strategic word here. What makes the WIKI referenced likely claim more logical and probable than say: AZOV -> AZOTH? Bias?
I do agree with the notion that more inquiry should be done.
"Likely" implies experience of closely similar cases. Not applicable here. The presumption of innocence (truthfulness or accuracy) applies. You are just using "likely" as a magic word to cover over sheer fancy. But I don't get the impression that you bothered to read the Wiki entry, because you don't acknowledge the various name origins they reviewed. There is NO linguistic path to "azoth" which is only a chemical, and a mythical chemical at that, which reference appears 500 years after "azov."
"There is NO linguistic path to "azoth"" which remains am opinion. perhaps it could be argued an opinion based on a framework that usually works, yet, language is way more flexible.
I am not saying it IS ... it simply refer to the finding of being likely. It is not a magic word. It is a simple observation of fact.
Could be falls short of an IS statement.
Etymology is a problematic field of inquiry. De opinions of these people differ, and changes over time.
The etymological influence of esoteric groups, in the same vein as the development of local language bible translations, or other religious movements have an influence on language is easily underestimated. And that region has seen its share more than others.
To use a wiki page as authoritative is even to my 12 year old son something more than a tall order, and he did not even needed me to come to that conclusion.
So, no, despite your baseless ad hominem, I am not taking sides in this issue other than stating that I see enough room to leave the possibility.
Anything to give hope to a delusion, I guess. I don't think you were meant for this page. It is supposed to be about hard-headed pursuit of truth.
No language is a time machine. You have a 500-year hill to climb.
Interesting. Then perhaps it is wise to apply your own counsel and consider what you wrote.
You don't think. Really? How did that sentence appear in your text?
What you are in fact trying to convey is you think this page is not.for me. It.seems.to me.it is you who still has to climb the second grade writing skill hill.
So, now.we.have.jested at each other's expense, there is one issue I am inclined to address: you, my fren, have no authority. So, say and think as you like, I do not.give a rat's ass about.your opinion if all you all have is forceful derogatories.