My questions lead me to doubt the loyalty of Lincoln. I am still trying to sort out the facts about Lincoln as there are several things that stand out as we sort through history.
Lincoln was a member of the B.a.r and held the foreign title of esquire. Under the original 13th amendment that was written and signed but was mysteriously swept under the rug and not recognized, He would not be able to be president while holding a foreign title and having sworn an oath to a foreign state or organization such as the b.a.r. This would make it appear that he was the foreign puppet that infiltrated our government.
Was he still a member of the b.a.r while in office?
Who does the b.a.r serve? The crown. I.e Bankers?
Can you serve two masters?
Which oath would supersede?
Why did the establishment of the banking cabal firmly take control of this country so easily, immediately following the foundations Lincoln put in place?
Was the establishment of martial law a good thing for this country? Was the creation of executive order and corporate bureaucracy a good thing?
History is a weapon, if we don’t sort it out, it will be used against us in a court of law.
I’m not sure that’s the very best argument, and here’s why I would say that
The tribes across the country knew we were in a civil war and so the raids and massacres upon settlers, men women and children, exploded during that period. One could argue that the actions of the army against certain tribes after the civil war were reactionary and provoked.
You should research how imaginative, creative and brutal many North American tribes were at torturing their captives and how much they enjoyed raping, plundering, murdering and slave trading.
I’m not defending the genocide that did in fact take place, but in a world of guns, germs and steel you can’t claim victim and innocence after you take up arms and are/were defeated in battle. Warlords of a country got conquered by the invading warlords of another. Does it make it right, I guess that’s debatable, to me it just means that the settlers who the Indians began waging war upon were backed by bigger stronger warlords than the Indians and the Indians lost.
Bringing it back to the North and the South
The problem lies in the obfuscation and fog of war where we find high ranking characters within both sides, who would seem to be playing for the same team and it wasn’t “we the people”.
All good points. Lincoln was from a cabal family. That seems very high probability, and he likely never would have been elected if not. His wife may have been his "handler" as she also appeared to be from a cabal family.
Clearly Lincoln did something very specific counter to what he was instructed to do, and this is why they killed him. We will figure it all out eventually, but for now Lincoln is a "mixed bag", imo, doing some very good Union preservation and Constitution preservation things. Note that the corruptive part of history is when leaders at the top get blamed for 100% of the bad shit that unfolds during a war, some of which is engineered for that exact purpose.
That is a very deep question and it seems the more one digs the more one uncovers a tangled web of lies and corruption, which most people don’t want to sort through so they give up.
I would add they not only use history as a weapon but our ignorance of language.
If you have not come across this conference, it is a wealth of knowledge and information and I highly recommend digging into what is presented.
I’ll suggest getting a note pad from the beginning because once you get into it you’ll tell yourself you need it.
After watching it, you should have a much better understanding of how it ties into Lincoln and the era and timeframe we are discussing in this thread and hopefully it clarifies what I meant by how they use our ignorance of both language and history against us. Courts are their battlefield of choice and they have done everything they can to rig it in their favor.
My opinion is that what is presented in this conference is one of the most powerful solutions and explanations
of how we take back and restore our Republic from the ground up that I have come across.
Interesting stuff,
I came across this interesting article a little while ago about the Guys who found the documents and a little history behind it.
http://usavsus.info/usA--Original13thAmend.htm
My questions lead me to doubt the loyalty of Lincoln. I am still trying to sort out the facts about Lincoln as there are several things that stand out as we sort through history. Lincoln was a member of the B.a.r and held the foreign title of esquire. Under the original 13th amendment that was written and signed but was mysteriously swept under the rug and not recognized, He would not be able to be president while holding a foreign title and having sworn an oath to a foreign state or organization such as the b.a.r. This would make it appear that he was the foreign puppet that infiltrated our government.
Was he still a member of the b.a.r while in office? Who does the b.a.r serve? The crown. I.e Bankers? Can you serve two masters? Which oath would supersede? Why did the establishment of the banking cabal firmly take control of this country so easily, immediately following the foundations Lincoln put in place?
Was the establishment of martial law a good thing for this country? Was the creation of executive order and corporate bureaucracy a good thing?
History is a weapon, if we don’t sort it out, it will be used against us in a court of law.
I’m not sure that’s the very best argument, and here’s why I would say that The tribes across the country knew we were in a civil war and so the raids and massacres upon settlers, men women and children, exploded during that period. One could argue that the actions of the army against certain tribes after the civil war were reactionary and provoked.
You should research how imaginative, creative and brutal many North American tribes were at torturing their captives and how much they enjoyed raping, plundering, murdering and slave trading.
I’m not defending the genocide that did in fact take place, but in a world of guns, germs and steel you can’t claim victim and innocence after you take up arms and are/were defeated in battle. Warlords of a country got conquered by the invading warlords of another. Does it make it right, I guess that’s debatable, to me it just means that the settlers who the Indians began waging war upon were backed by bigger stronger warlords than the Indians and the Indians lost.
Bringing it back to the North and the South The problem lies in the obfuscation and fog of war where we find high ranking characters within both sides, who would seem to be playing for the same team and it wasn’t “we the people”.
All good points. Lincoln was from a cabal family. That seems very high probability, and he likely never would have been elected if not. His wife may have been his "handler" as she also appeared to be from a cabal family.
Clearly Lincoln did something very specific counter to what he was instructed to do, and this is why they killed him. We will figure it all out eventually, but for now Lincoln is a "mixed bag", imo, doing some very good Union preservation and Constitution preservation things. Note that the corruptive part of history is when leaders at the top get blamed for 100% of the bad shit that unfolds during a war, some of which is engineered for that exact purpose.
Got my attention fren, "History as a weapon, Every action and inaction got us where we are now. Can it really be sorted out?
“Can it be sorted out”
That is a very deep question and it seems the more one digs the more one uncovers a tangled web of lies and corruption, which most people don’t want to sort through so they give up.
I would add they not only use history as a weapon but our ignorance of language.
https://rumble.com/v10w2xh-david-straight-out-of-babylon-part-1-of-8.html
If you have not come across this conference, it is a wealth of knowledge and information and I highly recommend digging into what is presented. I’ll suggest getting a note pad from the beginning because once you get into it you’ll tell yourself you need it.
After watching it, you should have a much better understanding of how it ties into Lincoln and the era and timeframe we are discussing in this thread and hopefully it clarifies what I meant by how they use our ignorance of both language and history against us. Courts are their battlefield of choice and they have done everything they can to rig it in their favor.
My opinion is that what is presented in this conference is one of the most powerful solutions and explanations of how we take back and restore our Republic from the ground up that I have come across.