Breaking::: Free Eye Exam for those Willing to OPEN Theirs👀👀
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
Whether the earth is flat or round or a triangle can be proven by a variety of techniques. These are experiments that anyone can conduct on their own.
Regarding some people actually being lizards, that's an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary proof. Humans landing on the moon is also an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary proof. To prove either of these, we need more than the claims of a few, or out of focus questionable "big foot" videos. Please don't reverse the requirements on either of these. Likewise, saying Biden is really someone else also requires proof, especially when the supposed proof shows a lot of points of comparison that haven't changed.
Proof we landed on the moon? NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has orbited and mapped the Moon at the highest resolution ever has mapped the 3 landing sites, showing the still intact appallo 14 landing site. Unfortunately I cannot teleport you to the moon, but there are satellites and those can take images. Those images show us being there. Unless that is, you believe satellites don't exist. But do you believe in telescopes? What about point on of those to a satellite? Or is that a bluebeam lazer illusion?
As my point was, you need to prove we landed on the moon, not that we didn't land on the moon. It's important not to reverse the burden of proof. If you're satisfied with all the proof you just described, great.
It's 6 landing sites, not 3.
You asked if I "believe in" telescopes. I don't "believe in" anything. I believe things when it can be demonstrated. Meaning I "believe that, because...". If telescopes can be demonstrated, then it can be believable. If telescopes cannot be demonstrated, then there is no reason to find it believable. "Believing in" things is asking one to turn their brain off and not think about why you believe it or if it's warranted to be believable.
As for your chain of logic here, you're making some unwarranted leaps. If your only proof that NASA went to the moon is from supposed photos provided by NASA and not a neutral third party, then that's a proof that wouldn't hold up in a court of law by itself. Being combative about minor side issues like satellites, telescopes, and lasers is not a clear way to think about this.
Finally, I never even shared what my position on the moon is. I'm only providing guidance on how to properly analyze fantastic claims, in a way that's grounded in reality. FYI, my grandfather worked for a NASA contractor and was one of the engineers who designed the Apollo Spacecraft, a fact we're very proud of in my family.
All I would need to do is prove we went one time. You are correct since telescopes exist and it is objectively true, it wouldn't matter if you believe or not. If I can't get any of the data from NASA I could then use any of the multitude of private photography correct?
The fantastic claim isn't how many times we went to the moon, but that humans went to the moon at all. So showing that we went there, it makes it a lot more plausible that it happened whether it was 1 time or 100 times.
If you had private photography from multiple independent sources showing signs of humans being on the moon, then it would be excellent proof for humans being on the moon.
Most people can easily go purchase a telescope and test it for themselves, so whether telescopes are a thing or not can be easily verified. This is not something typically that you're going to find people arguing about.
A stolen election also requires proof. The proof was shown; and ignored.
Same thing here.
No proof was shown of him being fake
Open your eyes