This calmly infuriates me.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
What are the few compelling anomalies?
Some of the experiments with the p900 zoom camera were interesting.
According to calculations (I don't remember the details, so I'll make some guesstimates here as an example) apparently something 20 miles away would be quite a bit below the horizon when on a level surface, something like 50 odd meters. (assuming a viewing height of about 2m).
However, when using one of these zoom camera's they were able to zoom in on something that was about 20 miles away (on a clear day obviously) even though technically it shouldn't be possible as it should be hidden by the curve, or at least the bottom 50m of it shouldn't be visible, so anything short of that you shouldn't be able to see.
Have you looked into refraction? I think thats a very easy thing for globe earthers to answer with. I think the thing that flat earthers would have to explain is, why would the object ever not be visible. Meaning, refraction explains why an object would sometimes be visible around the curve of the earth, for instance southern michigan dunes can sometimes see the tops of buildings in Chicago. What flat earthers would then have to explain is, why the bottoms of the buildings were not visible and why Chicago is not always visible with clear skies.