If UK did store very dangerous tank shells uranium cores in that Neo-Nazi-NATO's storage. I bet their depleted uranium was destroyed. In the video above, the explosion is big and actually looks like an erupting volcano projecting lava (melted "stuff") very high into the air. This video show this starting at 50 seconds at https://youtu.be/Tkr5Q0aadXk?t=53
I can't attest to it, and wouldn't claim it in court, but I've had it explained to me by folks that have the job to know such stuff that the depleted uranium used in the penetrator rounds in tank munitions isn't enough above background radiation levels to be a problem. The danger comes from the heavy metal particles if inhaled or ingested, not the radiation. But the metal particles themselves.
I wonder if the "tank rounds" were there to provide plausible deniability for a bomb giving off radiation.
And does Ukraine even have any operational tanks of western make that can fire NATO 120mm tank rounds?
We've heard of crews being sent hither and yon to train, but are any such tanks actually in the combat theater yet? and in enough numbers to require that much ammo storage?
I don't know. That's why I ask.
P.S. I do get a kick out of how many folks believe that "oh! such and such a country is giving Ukraine a bunch of modern tanks!" like conscript soldiers, scrapped up off the street the week prior can just jump into those tanks and be full pro! in their use.
You mean like in the Balkans, where the rates were never counted until after the war and all the sudden the rates were higher! than the rates that weren't even rated before the war?
Sounds more to me like someone blew us up the bomb.
Might not be such a good idea to store nuke warheads in an impact area.
I agree. This seems to be the more plausible speculation. Related big May 13th, 2023 explosion at https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6IHqx4X/may-13th-2023-video-3-minutes-ne/c/
If UK did store very dangerous tank shells uranium cores in that Neo-Nazi-NATO's storage. I bet their depleted uranium was destroyed. In the video above, the explosion is big and actually looks like an erupting volcano projecting lava (melted "stuff") very high into the air. This video show this starting at 50 seconds at https://youtu.be/Tkr5Q0aadXk?t=53
I can't attest to it, and wouldn't claim it in court, but I've had it explained to me by folks that have the job to know such stuff that the depleted uranium used in the penetrator rounds in tank munitions isn't enough above background radiation levels to be a problem. The danger comes from the heavy metal particles if inhaled or ingested, not the radiation. But the metal particles themselves.
I wonder if the "tank rounds" were there to provide plausible deniability for a bomb giving off radiation.
And does Ukraine even have any operational tanks of western make that can fire NATO 120mm tank rounds?
We've heard of crews being sent hither and yon to train, but are any such tanks actually in the combat theater yet? and in enough numbers to require that much ammo storage?
I don't know. That's why I ask.
P.S. I do get a kick out of how many folks believe that "oh! such and such a country is giving Ukraine a bunch of modern tanks!" like conscript soldiers, scrapped up off the street the week prior can just jump into those tanks and be full pro! in their use.
Tell that to the residents in Fallujah with increased birth defects, stillborn births, and higher cancer rates
Uh huh.
You mean like in the Balkans, where the rates were never counted until after the war and all the sudden the rates were higher! than the rates that weren't even rated before the war?
Like that.
Yeah.
Thanks for being played.