he's shown that he's a smart guy willing to stand up for both the first and second amendment. he's also shown he's not afraid to admit when he's wrong.
you just sound like a scared sarcastic anonymous poster. offer a little more if you want to convince anybody
just a stickler for accuracy, and trusting the plan. i know our future includes technology that would make many people uncomfortable today. but that has always been true.
Through words (unless you want to argue his takeover of Twitter which has allowed the Overton window to shift more towards mainstream conservatism was an action, I would counterargue that continued censorship of other viewpoints more than undoes that and his hiring of a WEF CEO is another piece of evidence of this being a "control both sides" operation). Don't worry though, that attitude only got our country taken advantage of by politicians for centuries, I'm sure it'll prove fruitful this time. In any case, your continuous insults are wasted here, as I'd have to give a fuck. Enjoy yourself
Hmmm. It's a shame this has been taken into an argumentative combative arena. Seems like you have a few good points to make, and a real discussion would probably yield more fruit than he said she said.
You didn't comprehend the entire thread did you? Those actual actions were addressed previously in the thread containing the message you're replying to
So you comprehended yet chose to ignore all the other actions, plus the fact that he used to change his profile all the time but has intentionally been Satan armor for more than half a year, to focus only on "he wore this thing for Halloween". Interesting. Not what I would have expected, particularly not from someone interested in dialog.
So you're saying I should instead take a cue from you and imply that the people I'm talking to are unable to comprehend what I'm saying instead of just assuming it wasn't comprehended. I suppose that level of projected intellectual superiority is less snotty
That's right, when people show you who they are, don't believe them. Only listen to their words
he's shown that he's a smart guy willing to stand up for both the first and second amendment. he's also shown he's not afraid to admit when he's wrong.
you just sound like a scared sarcastic anonymous poster. offer a little more if you want to convince anybody
Damn you all on Elons jock huh? Haha. That's alright. Funny.
just a stickler for accuracy, and trusting the plan. i know our future includes technology that would make many people uncomfortable today. but that has always been true.
Good insight. I think it's helpful to be real and, and I agree in this point you make about tech.
Through words (unless you want to argue his takeover of Twitter which has allowed the Overton window to shift more towards mainstream conservatism was an action, I would counterargue that continued censorship of other viewpoints more than undoes that and his hiring of a WEF CEO is another piece of evidence of this being a "control both sides" operation). Don't worry though, that attitude only got our country taken advantage of by politicians for centuries, I'm sure it'll prove fruitful this time. In any case, your continuous insults are wasted here, as I'd have to give a fuck. Enjoy yourself
who is in control again? read the sidebar
Hmmm. It's a shame this has been taken into an argumentative combative arena. Seems like you have a few good points to make, and a real discussion would probably yield more fruit than he said she said.
Cos everyone in the Us shows who they REALLY are when Halloween comes along, right?
Um, so, a person is now defined by a costume that they wear, rather than the actions that they actual take?
I don't think so...
You didn't comprehend the entire thread did you? Those actual actions were addressed previously in the thread containing the message you're replying to
I read it all, and personally, I think I comprehended it fine.
I won't argue about whether YOU comprehended any of the arguments challenging your positions, because that would really be futile.
Hey, by the way, why not try just a little to be not so argumentative, aggressive, and downright snotty. Or not. Either way.
So you comprehended yet chose to ignore all the other actions, plus the fact that he used to change his profile all the time but has intentionally been Satan armor for more than half a year, to focus only on "he wore this thing for Halloween". Interesting. Not what I would have expected, particularly not from someone interested in dialog.
So you're saying I should instead take a cue from you and imply that the people I'm talking to are unable to comprehend what I'm saying instead of just assuming it wasn't comprehended. I suppose that level of projected intellectual superiority is less snotty