The remote takeover of the aircraft is very plausible, and in my opinion it's why the smoking gun which is building 7 still had to fall, after flight 93 remote takeover went wrong.

Again, IMO flight 93 was intended to hit building 7 to complete the perceived collapse and cover the loss of the data that was housed there, as it was in the 3 other buildings that were bought down.

When flight 93 remote hijacking went wrong, they still had to destroy building 7 and turn it into the key fact that undermines the whole official narrative. The University of Alaska study into the collapse of building 7 fairly recently released shows categorically that the official NIST narrative about the collapse is full of shit.

The trouble is most people have never heard of the fall of building 7, nor what was housed there!