A lil 9/11 truth for ya
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
TDLR: The building would have shredded the plane, and proper fire retardant system would have allowed the fuel to burn itself out in less than 2 hours with virtually zero structural damage to the building (superficial damage is NOT structural damage).
They intentionally monkeyed with the fire retardant coating on the targeted floors for one of the buildings to make sure there was a big fire:
"Overview of the Structural Design of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 Buildings", NIST; https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=910105
Did they hit the wrong floors on WTC2? The intended targeted ones likely had the thermal protection also modified like WTC1.
Both towers designed to withstand the impact of an aircraft and associated fires due to impact of a B-25 bomber airplane into Empire State Building in 1945: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash
Design of World Trade Center Towers: Aircraft Impact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_World_Trade_Center
Note that the 707 was a smaller version and earlier derivative model of the planes that supposedly hit with similar structural construction as a largely aluminum skin attached to minimal 7000 series aluminum frames and spars.
Agreed. The fires and explosions were for "show". Clearly some sort of concrete pulverization and timed charges on support columns caused the demolition.
We see ALL. Thank you, patriot.
Major sauce...the mini nukes had been speculated for years, and likely was the cause of the all the first responder cancers, imo. I remember seeing video of molten metal still flowing at the bottom of the pile even 3 weeks after 9/11.