Well when the architects asked NIST for specific information surrounding its conclusions, as they were the ones designing and building these structures, NIST said it couldn't let them have that information and kept it hidden. NIST specifically said that the column that failed did so because the load beam/column (73 or 78 I forget without looking it up) failed and slipped off, causing a global collapse is simply not true. These were designed intentionally so as that couldn't happen, dig deeper into the design and you will see what I mean.
IMO NIST were deliberately lying from the outset, and when caught they doubled down even further, and when pushed they then said it couldn't release the information which makes no sense, even their computer modelling was complete nonsense and didn't show a complete global collapse that would allow for what was witnessed and filmed, ie the whole structure falling to the ground in just over 10 secs.
This was before the UAF released their report. So yes, I believe that NIST lied from the outset.
The basis for the conspiracy is what data and who were housed in WTC7, just like the other 3 buildings that day. And why would some want that gone?
Much like the "Anthrax attacks" that happened shortly after, it was used to go into Iraq and to justify that action. Without question, the Anthrax came only from the US Military, and just so happened to be targeted at the two Senators that wouldn't vote for the Patriot Act, which after they received the alleged Anthrax, they then did.
Everything that happened, happened for a reason, and not the reasons we were told at the time imho.
Well when the architects asked NIST for specific information surrounding its conclusions, as they were the ones designing and building these structures, NIST said it couldn't let them have that information and kept it hidden. NIST specifically said that the column that failed did so because the load beam/column (73 or 78 I forget without looking it up) failed and slipped off, causing a global collapse is simply not true. These were designed intentionally so as that couldn't happen, dig deeper into the design and you will see what I mean.
IMO NIST were deliberately lying from the outset, and when caught they doubled down even further, and when pushed they then said it couldn't release the information which makes no sense, even their computer modelling was complete nonsense and didn't show a complete global collapse that would allow for what was witnessed and filmed, ie the whole structure falling to the ground in just over 10 secs.
This was before the UAF released their report. So yes, I believe that NIST lied from the outset.
The basis for the conspiracy is what data and who were housed in WTC7, just like the other 3 buildings that day. And why would some want that gone?
Much like the "Anthrax attacks" that happened shortly after, it was used to go into Iraq and to justify that action. Without question, the Anthrax came only from the US Military, and just so happened to be targeted at the two Senators that wouldn't vote for the Patriot Act, which after they received the alleged Anthrax, they then did.
Everything that happened, happened for a reason, and not the reasons we were told at the time imho.
Not to mention the fact that it was reported as having fallen just minutes before it actually fell.