I'm not insulting nor questioning you nor your father, but how do you explain the above video which doesn't show a single scrap of aircraft wreckage?
How do you explain the surveillance camera footage which relatively clearly shows an object that - coincidentally of course - is exactly the size of a cruise missile striking the Pentagon?
Er wait...... are you talking about the Twin Towers?
Yeah, I don't necessarily doubt that planes hit the WTC, but I do think the towers were pre-rigged with tons of explosives.
To clarify; I'd certainly be open to the possibility that NO planes hit ANYTHING on 9/11, but I think what's more likely is:
Twin Towers were pre-rigged with explosives. There's no physical way the aircraft strike & ensuing damage 100% on its own collapsed the towers.
How does anyone explain WTC 7???
The surveillance camera footage of the pentagon very clearly (well, in 2001 VHS clarity LOL) shows a cruise-missile sized thing shooting towards the pentagon & then an explosion.
SO anyway; your dad saw aircraft hit the twin towers?
yeah. and we saw the nose of one of the planes come out of the other side of the building fully intact, in a video that was never displayed again on live TV. Have you seen what a several-pound bird strike does to the nose of a 757? How can you see it come out the other side of a steel building fully intact and not question the narrative?
A video compositing error + timed explosives rather than a plane impact.
No planes hit any buildings on 911.
Come at me bro.
Tell me how your uncle saw the planes hit the buildings with his own eyes.
The reason they will expend infinite money on trying to stop speech like this is because:
The media was complicit on 911
They put the doctored video feeds on the air.
They are desperately trying to keep that fact from spreading.
Too bad....
You chased us off all the platforms you control, so now we have platforms you do not control.
My dad was in Jersey City and saw the plane hit with his own eyes.
I'm not insulting nor questioning you nor your father, but how do you explain the above video which doesn't show a single scrap of aircraft wreckage?
How do you explain the surveillance camera footage which relatively clearly shows an object that - coincidentally of course - is exactly the size of a cruise missile striking the Pentagon?
Er wait...... are you talking about the Twin Towers?
Yeah, I don't necessarily doubt that planes hit the WTC, but I do think the towers were pre-rigged with tons of explosives.
To clarify; I'd certainly be open to the possibility that NO planes hit ANYTHING on 9/11, but I think what's more likely is:
Twin Towers were pre-rigged with explosives. There's no physical way the aircraft strike & ensuing damage 100% on its own collapsed the towers.
How does anyone explain WTC 7???
The surveillance camera footage of the pentagon very clearly (well, in 2001 VHS clarity LOL) shows a cruise-missile sized thing shooting towards the pentagon & then an explosion.
SO anyway; your dad saw aircraft hit the twin towers?
I don't dispute that.
yeah. and we saw the nose of one of the planes come out of the other side of the building fully intact, in a video that was never displayed again on live TV. Have you seen what a several-pound bird strike does to the nose of a 757? How can you see it come out the other side of a steel building fully intact and not question the narrative?
A video compositing error + timed explosives rather than a plane impact.