1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

You forgot.... We will enjoy 4 years of heads rolling, and Trump doing everything he would have done his first term if he wasn't up for re-election.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right there with you. I think I bought in even a bit higher. Holding permanently. Either I lose it all, or eventually make money. I thought they were supposed to be coming out with a conservative streaming platform to rival netflix and all of the others. We should see a big bump when that happens.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

They wanted to use them to flood republican cities, basically gerrymandering future democrat voters, and disenfranchising Republican votes. Any good republican would do the same thing to protect their constituents.

It's hilarious that Democrats can't figure out what to do with them, yet prior to the bussing, they were madly pushing to allow MORE to flood in.

5
GetRightNews 5 points ago +5 / -0

And he never will be, because the words "march peacefully and patriotically" do not equal insurrection.

3
GetRightNews 3 points ago +3 / -0

Funny how all these people preach against russia, but they use Russian tropes to communicate with each other, in typical communist fashion.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then the 7th circuit needs to lose it's right to rule on the 2nd amendment.

So by their logic, a pistol brace (also banned) or one of those adapters that can turn a Glock into a PCC, can modify a handgun to become more powerful. So are handguns the next to be removed from the reach of the second amendment? What will we be left with, shotguns and single action rifles? Until they start being used in mass events, because they are all that is left (the most efficient weapon, like AR's are now)

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

Phone Lady's "we use masks in certain areas and for sterile procedures" angle was a nice try. But the only purpose of those masks is to prevent large droplets of saliva and bodily fluids to be exchanged. NOT to prevent catching a virus. They lost that argument too.

Also, if there is no federal mandate any longer, (even Joe Biden said it) how are they going to tell her what to do with "her body her choice".

2
GetRightNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope she takes this to the ends of the legal system, and opens the door for every future case to use it as a precedent, changing the system and shutting these tyrants down.

2
GetRightNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's also a significant likelihood that I'd never vote for a clown like him in place of Trump.

2
GetRightNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well he's running independent now, after Biden wouldn't even extend him the courtesy of secret service protection. A standard offering to ALL presidential candidates. Combined with a record Red hispanic and black vote, losing Democrat votes to an independent will be the end of the Democrat party.

I can already predict them manufacturing some dirt on him, like they tried with Trump.

2
GetRightNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then we have idiots like cernovich coming out saying trump will lose and his enemies will come after us.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, the before tweet would indicate that. No mention, then 3 weeks later he needs emergency surgery?

25
GetRightNews 25 points ago +25 / -0

He'll never come to the realization that the vaccines he pushed so viciously are likely the cause of his heart issues.

3
GetRightNews 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or maybe it will expose all these bitter, entitled Millionaire actors claiming to be poor, and begging for more money to keep food on the table. All while many/most everyday americans are actually struggling to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table thanks to the economy that the radical policies and past philanthropy of these elites has supported. Hollywood NEEDS US more than we need them. FACT!

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, if he actually says "the storm is upon us", I'll probably lose my shit.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, Tucker is saying 8:55pm, meaning viewers will start watching it first, before the vice presidential debates (fox scripted debates) at 9PM.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only mention of anything "jewish" in all of the Q drops was about "saving israel for last", likely because it's the most corrupt, and will be the hardest to cleanse. There were many mentions of child trafficking, and none of them could ever be interpreted as antisemitic.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

Um, the physical evidence was the F**KING COKE! Was hunter finishing it off during Biden's 4th of July speech or something?

How do you end an investigation due to "lack of physical evidence" when the original reason for the investigation was the found physical evidence?

2
GetRightNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

How is child trafficking antisemitic? Sounds like he's labeling jews as child molesters.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

Learn to become Conservative. We will actually welcome you, unlike what the Democrats do to people that don't tow their line.

3
GetRightNews 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need a few of those boxes of glasses from 'They LIVE!'

2
GetRightNews 2 points ago +2 / -0

Next we need to focus on the ridiculous NDAA we got, courtesy of Obama, which legalized the mainstream media to lie, spread propaganda, and label it as fact.

1
GetRightNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was no clearly defined runway, and I don't believe there were any flight-sims back then that would have accurately taken a terrorist into the pentagon. I'd argue that the pilot had to have made some major corrections toward the end. Also, the topography near the Pentagon isn't exactly flat for miles. They would have been dodging obstacles to maintain their flight plan. We can agree to disagree, but take a look at the testimony of experts on flight characteristics.The planes may have been "floating" above the ground, but the engines would have had little thrust to do much else, other than climb or make micro-corrections.

view more: Next ›