I don't follow your thinking. In an anti-tank round, the penetration comes from brute force plastic deformation of the steel by a denser, harder penetrator projectile. It is not melting the steel armor.
No one has ever said that the fuel in the 767 melted the Twin Towers. That is an absurdity. But the burning fuel can certainly heat the structural columns to temperatures where its strength would be gone. Structural steel is reduced to 30% of its room temperature strength by the time it reaches 600 deg C. Meanwhile, what is to stop a passport from drifting down to the ground within moments of the collision?
The problem is that there is no "lie" involved in "the official narrative." It is coherent and consistent with known physics and engineering. It seems to me that a Lot of People have jumped off the cliff of "It's all lies," and have psychotically denied the truth. Not because there is compelling evidence that something else is the truth and we have the detailed receipts---but because there is a psychological need to feed the paranoid narrative of "it's all lies." If the "official narrative" were understood to be the truth...then what becomes of "it's all lies"? That, itself, would become a lie. And then we would have to scrutinize fellow-travelers who have fallen off the deep end with fabulous paranoid conspiracies. That wouldn't be polite, perhaps. And it would be fraught with self-recognition. But maybe a step back from the brink, toward sanity, is a good idea, if the alternative is to embrace insanity and become untouchable from the normie point of view.
And, by the way, water (and everything else) does stick to a spinning ball, to the tune of 1 pound force for 1 pound of mass. Nothing else to pull it away. (The effect of the spin is teeny-tiny by comparison.)
I don't follow your thinking. In an anti-tank round, the penetration comes from brute force plastic deformation of the steel by a denser, harder penetrator projectile. It is not melting the steel armor.
No one has ever said that the fuel in the 767 melted the Twin Towers. That is an absurdity. But the burning fuel can certainly heat the structural columns to temperatures where its strength would be gone. Structural steel is reduced to 30% of its room temperature strength by the time it reaches 600 deg C. Meanwhile, what is to stop a passport from drifting down to the ground within moments of the collision?
The problem is that there is no "lie" involved in "the official narrative." It is coherent and consistent with known physics and engineering. It seems to me that a Lot of People have jumped off the cliff of "It's all lies," and have psychotically denied the truth. Not because there is compelling evidence that something else is the truth and we have the detailed receipts---but because there is a psychological need to feed the paranoid narrative of "it's all lies." If the "official narrative" were understood to be the truth...then what becomes of "it's all lies"? That, itself, would become a lie. And then we would have to scrutinize fellow-travelers who have fallen off the deep end with fabulous paranoid conspiracies. That wouldn't be polite, perhaps. And it would be fraught with self-recognition. But maybe a step back from the brink, toward sanity, is a good idea, if the alternative is to embrace insanity and become untouchable from the normie point of view.
And, by the way, water (and everything else) does stick to a spinning ball, to the tune of 1 pound force for 1 pound of mass. Nothing else to pull it away. (The effect of the spin is teeny-tiny by comparison.)