It is exceptionally difficult to land an aircraft with no glideslope indicators.
Modern aircraft and airports have several redundant systems.
Flight 77 which 'hit' the Pentagon had NONE of those.
It had no localizer beam which tells the pilot if they are high/low or right/left
It had no Visual Glideslope Indicators like VASI or PAPI which tell the pilot using white/red lights if they are high or low.
It had no GPS for RNAV.
Not only was the story of a half trained 'pilot' making a near impossible 'landing' into the pentagon unbelievable by itself, it is then compounded by the speed of the 'landing' aircraft. It was supposedly traveling at 530 mph, far beyond the normal landing speeds of any aircraft, thereby making any kind of visual adjustments into the target impossible. In fact that speed is far beyond the Vne (never exceed velocity) of that aircraft (757) at that low altitude.
A half trained 'pilot' with no glideslope indicators could never hit that target at that speed. A veteran pilot with 30,000 hours could not hit that target at that speed. But we are asked to believe that three rank amateurs all pulled it off without fail?
What they want us to believe is not only impossible, it requires us to believe several stacked and nested impossibilities.
The kerosene based jet fuel used in the planes does not burn hot enough to melt the I-beams... Given time and exposure to heat, it may weaken them and possibly make them structurally unsound... The jet fuel burns at approximately 1000 degrees cooler than the melting temperature of steel...
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/
Right ???? Lots of evidence on Sooo many lies being exposed… Have to believe those complicit (That are still with us😏) are Becoming a tad Anxious about ALL that’s being revealed on Sooo many issues !!!!
inside job is easy to say. you have no idea just how far inside it goes... U.S. has been post constitutional for decades. jus waitin for the rest to catch up. the other mccarthy was right all along. panic in the 50's (in the military)
Further substantiating this woman's story is the fact that there were intact books and paper visible in the offices after the outer wall collapsed...that wouldn't be there if jet fuel had been present.
So many people always use the "they were full of fuel and that melted the beams" narrative!
However the reality is that passenger jets don't go around flying everywhere with a full tank of gas! Each flight will have it's predicated fuel usage calculated, included within is the amount for a diversion in case of weather, and a minimum amount required on landing.
So fuelled for a flight from Boston to LA, and taking into account the amount burnt during the flight towards the WTC it would be substantially lower than "full fuel tanks" - probably around 50% - 55% full would be a best guess.
And no, it won't burn hot enough to melt steel beams, in fact when you see the images of the fireball it is quite clear pretty much all of it was burnt off very quickly, and no where near enough left to travel down the elevator shafts of the entire building and then melt beams.
It is exceptionally difficult to land an aircraft with no glideslope indicators. Modern aircraft and airports have several redundant systems. Flight 77 which 'hit' the Pentagon had NONE of those.
It had no localizer beam which tells the pilot if they are high/low or right/left It had no Visual Glideslope Indicators like VASI or PAPI which tell the pilot using white/red lights if they are high or low. It had no GPS for RNAV.
Not only was the story of a half trained 'pilot' making a near impossible 'landing' into the pentagon unbelievable by itself, it is then compounded by the speed of the 'landing' aircraft. It was supposedly traveling at 530 mph, far beyond the normal landing speeds of any aircraft, thereby making any kind of visual adjustments into the target impossible. In fact that speed is far beyond the Vne (never exceed velocity) of that aircraft (757) at that low altitude.
A half trained 'pilot' with no glideslope indicators could never hit that target at that speed. A veteran pilot with 30,000 hours could not hit that target at that speed. But we are asked to believe that three rank amateurs all pulled it off without fail?
What they want us to believe is not only impossible, it requires us to believe several stacked and nested impossibilities.
The kerosene based jet fuel used in the planes does not burn hot enough to melt the I-beams... Given time and exposure to heat, it may weaken them and possibly make them structurally unsound... The jet fuel burns at approximately 1000 degrees cooler than the melting temperature of steel... https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/
Right ???? Lots of evidence on Sooo many lies being exposed… Have to believe those complicit (That are still with us😏) are Becoming a tad Anxious about ALL that’s being revealed on Sooo many issues !!!!
Agreed my fren... Cheers...
👍right back at ya
inside job is easy to say. you have no idea just how far inside it goes... U.S. has been post constitutional for decades. jus waitin for the rest to catch up. the other mccarthy was right all along. panic in the 50's (in the military)
Further substantiating this woman's story is the fact that there were intact books and paper visible in the offices after the outer wall collapsed...that wouldn't be there if jet fuel had been present.
So many people always use the "they were full of fuel and that melted the beams" narrative!
However the reality is that passenger jets don't go around flying everywhere with a full tank of gas! Each flight will have it's predicated fuel usage calculated, included within is the amount for a diversion in case of weather, and a minimum amount required on landing.
So fuelled for a flight from Boston to LA, and taking into account the amount burnt during the flight towards the WTC it would be substantially lower than "full fuel tanks" - probably around 50% - 55% full would be a best guess.
And no, it won't burn hot enough to melt steel beams, in fact when you see the images of the fireball it is quite clear pretty much all of it was burnt off very quickly, and no where near enough left to travel down the elevator shafts of the entire building and then melt beams.