@TomFitton :
FBI to bring Biden document to Capitol Hill Monday, after threats to hold Wray in contempt of Congress (@SchmittNYC responds..
Expect trump to be indicted 10 mins before this happens.)
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 INDICTMENTS INCOMING 🌎
A few questions
Do you think many people would be paying attention to the "Biden document" if Wray had just upped and said "sure, here it is"?
Do you think that MORE people are paying MORE attention to the document and will pay more attention to it now that there has been what looks like* a standoff between the Republican congress and Wray (aka the FBI)?
If you are a showman, how do you attract attention and therefor interest in your show, and the performance on the stage?
This is one of the key potential functions of "kayfabe". To draw attention, to stir things up, so that something becomes a bigger deal than it would be if none of that kayfabe took place.
Net Effects:
Whether Wray is a DS puppet or Wray is playing a role for Team DJT (and I personally lean much more towards the latter), the net effect of this <ahem> stand off between the congressional committee and the FBI is that the so-called document now has a LOT more eyes on it than otherwise would have been the case.
Anons pretty much all the time have eyes on most of this stuff, so much that it just seems normal to us now. And, we're about 3 or 4 years ahead of the rest of the population in terms of the information and putting 1 and 2 together.
But from the viewpoint of normie conservative or normie maga world, or even normie general population, I doubt there would have been as much attention on the biden document as there is right now.
Which begs the question: if Wray knew that he had to hand over the document anyway, in the end, which he would have (and as head of the FBI, you gotta think this guy is no dummy), why on earth hold it back to the extent that a contempt of congress charge would be threatened?
To protect the Biden family? I mean, really? They have to know by now that this is just totally a losing proposition. The Biden crime family's days are very clearly numbered. That should be 100% obvious.
No, this whole kerfuffle of give us doc, no, give us doc, no, give us doc or we'll charge your ass, ok. smells to me like utter kayfabe and frankly, exactly what Good ol'd Q suggested we do:
Enjoy the show.
Good points! Elon just did that for the film "What Is A Woman". Not only drew exponentially more eyes to it but got the head of trust and safety to step down. Winning!
I love how so many of the comments are all running under the assumption, nay, belief that Wray is dirty, that the DS is actually in a position to control (or even attempt to control) what is coming, that the increasing drip drip of information has not become an open faucet that this point, and that things are happening according to an orchestrated time schedule.
Me? The whole things seems more and more orchestrated, with patriots running the real show.
All good points brother. Trust Wray, right?
Well, I guess to my mind there is more to it than that. I mean, after all, can you or I actually 'trust' Wray? I mean, practically speaking, can we go up to Wray and say, "here, dude, hold on to my 10,000 for me. I trust you." Or trust him to watch over my dog while I go shopping?
I feel like what Q is saying in "Trust Kansas" "Trust Sessions" etc, is firstly that these are good operatives doing a specific job, and don't disregard what they are doing simply because of how things look on the surface.
Also Q is saying "we have our people in place".
I don't know exactly who or what Wray is, but the fact that Q writes "Trust Wray" says to me two possibilities.
One, that Wray is indeed a good operative playing a role. Two, that Wray is i fact a bad operative who Q wishes to discredit in the eyes of the Cabal by posting "Trust Wray". In other words, Q wants the deep state the think that Wray has been turned and is not their guy or is a double agent, etc., thus neutralizing what Wray can do and sowing distrust within Cabal ranks.
However, the latter really seems unlikely to me, because if so, why on Earth put Wray in as FBI director in the first place? you don't assign an enemy Major to your own machine gun battery protecting the beach where the troops are landing.
So I guess with Wray, now, for me, it's not so much that I trust him, just because Q said so. But rather, based on what Q has shared and based on what is going on, I have to question what Wray is doing, who he really is, and what is happening. And, when I do that, I reach the conclusion that he's playing a role in the unfolding of a process that is destroying the deep state and laying the foundation for DJT to fully drain the swamp for real.
I'm not worried about Wray, and I don't really need to trust him with anything. I mean, there's nothing I can do about Wray anyway. This may not be true for members of Congress, for example. Some of them will actually have to make a decision or choice as to whether they trust Wray (to work with them, play a role with them, achieve objectives with them, etc).
Me? I just sit back and experience and growing sense of confidence that there is a very real, orchestrated process under way, one that is leading in the right direction. That confidence is really important from the viewpoint of morale.