Your argument is baseless and born of a delusional misconception of reality.
If you choose when to apply morality on a case-by-case basis, it is not morality. And it is not of God, Who is the basis of morality, and Who is absolute. He will not selectively apply punishment on judgement day.
Basically, your argument is meaningless as the base assumptions being made are unsubstantiated and wrong.
Furthermore, to reference a common twitter meme, if I say "I like pancakes" and you respond with "so you hate waffles?", you have invented an entirely new sentence and are simply arguing a straw man.
So I don't think you understand my argument to even a small degree.
If I say "torture is always wrong", and you hear "pedophiles should be excused of their crimes and treated with leniency", you display a severe lack of critical thought and are seemingly no more intelligent than a liberal. You'd certainly be behaving and responding in the exact same way they do.
Righteous anger at the crimes these vile demon-scum commit against children will never justify your unrighteous and demonic view of what punishment they should receive. Never. Your dark fantasies of torture and revenge will always remain nearly as demonic as the people you claim to hate. Both their desires and actions, as well as yours, are born of Satan.
Frankly, who or what do you even stand for?
Jesus Christ, the Lord our God, and He who morality comes forth from? He who refused to stone the adulterous woman and instead told her: "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."?
Maybe God as presented exclusively in the Old Testament? The Old Testament where we are told: "Do not say, “I will repay evil”; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.”?
Or how about the constitution, our great founding document? Surely you believe in this? This which you apply selectively as the arbiter of when it "truly" applies according to some contrived notion of whom moral law applies to?
No, it seems to me that whatever you might stand for takes a back seat to a more primal desire for revenge and to a deep-seated darkness that is born of the Devil.
Interrogatories 101: The guilty will ramble on about virtue, and apply several logical attack fallacies to deflect from their guilt. YOU CHECK ALL BLOCKS
You are 100% either a Fedboi, or a Pedophile. My money is on both.
Edit: Seriously though, I'd love to see you retort one thing I said, point out a single logical fallacy (other than the ad hominem I employed by calling you a liberal that clearly hurt your fee fees, since that was in response to your illiterate ass calling me a pedophile (by insinuation)), and/or prove to me that you're not just too fucking lazy to read hence pulling out "rambling".
I fear God.
Your argument is baseless and born of a delusional misconception of reality.
If you choose when to apply morality on a case-by-case basis, it is not morality. And it is not of God, Who is the basis of morality, and Who is absolute. He will not selectively apply punishment on judgement day.
Basically, your argument is meaningless as the base assumptions being made are unsubstantiated and wrong.
Furthermore, to reference a common twitter meme, if I say "I like pancakes" and you respond with "so you hate waffles?", you have invented an entirely new sentence and are simply arguing a straw man.
So I don't think you understand my argument to even a small degree.
If I say "torture is always wrong", and you hear "pedophiles should be excused of their crimes and treated with leniency", you display a severe lack of critical thought and are seemingly no more intelligent than a liberal. You'd certainly be behaving and responding in the exact same way they do.
Righteous anger at the crimes these vile demon-scum commit against children will never justify your unrighteous and demonic view of what punishment they should receive. Never. Your dark fantasies of torture and revenge will always remain nearly as demonic as the people you claim to hate. Both their desires and actions, as well as yours, are born of Satan.
Frankly, who or what do you even stand for?
Jesus Christ, the Lord our God, and He who morality comes forth from? He who refused to stone the adulterous woman and instead told her: "Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more."?
Maybe God as presented exclusively in the Old Testament? The Old Testament where we are told: "Do not say, “I will repay evil”; wait for the Lord, and he will deliver you.”?
Or how about the constitution, our great founding document? Surely you believe in this? This which you apply selectively as the arbiter of when it "truly" applies according to some contrived notion of whom moral law applies to?
No, it seems to me that whatever you might stand for takes a back seat to a more primal desire for revenge and to a deep-seated darkness that is born of the Devil.
Now, any more questions?
Interrogatories 101: The guilty will ramble on about virtue, and apply several logical attack fallacies to deflect from their guilt. YOU CHECK ALL BLOCKS
You are 100% either a Fedboi, or a Pedophile. My money is on both.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Edit: Seriously though, I'd love to see you retort one thing I said, point out a single logical fallacy (other than the ad hominem I employed by calling you a liberal that clearly hurt your fee fees, since that was in response to your illiterate ass calling me a pedophile (by insinuation)), and/or prove to me that you're not just too fucking lazy to read hence pulling out "rambling".
Good fucking luck KEK