OP, thank you for posting this. It was serendipitous for me. I filed a Bar Complaint against a California Deputy Attorney General. The Bar refused to launch an investigation despite copious evidence. I was working on an appeal for the turn down last night.
Thanks to this article, this morning, I was able to add the following paragraph: "Since I have documented that FTB utilized Ms. Barsegyan’s legal advice and services to further commit crimes (such as FTB giving Anna Barsegyan our social security numbers so that Anna Barsegyan could post them on the internet, Anna Barsegyan advising her client to violate our California Taxpayer Rights to hide evidence of crimes committed by FTB, etc), Ms. Barsegyan’s attorney-client privilege with FTB is voided under the Crime-Fraud Exception Provision. Without attorney-client privilege, there is nothing to hinder a full and complete investigation into Anna Barsegyan’s unethical and unlawful activities committed in order to cover up her client’s unlawful activities. "
OP, thank you for posting this. It was serendipitous for me. I filed a Bar Complaint against a California Deputy Attorney General. The Bar refused to launch an investigation despite copious evidence. I was working on an appeal for the turn down last night.
Thanks to this article, this morning, I was able to add the following paragraph: "Since I have documented that FTB utilized Ms. Barsegyan’s legal advice and services to further commit crimes (such as FTB giving Anna Barsegyan our social security numbers so that Anna Barsegyan could post them on the internet, Anna Barsegyan advising her client to violate our California Taxpayer Rights to hide evidence of crimes committed by FTB, etc), Ms. Barsegyan’s attorney-client privilege with FTB is voided under the Crime-Fraud Exception Provision. Without attorney-client privilege, there is nothing to hinder a full and complete investigation into Anna Barsegyan’s unethical and unlawful activities committed in order to cover up her client’s unlawful activities. "
👍👌