They went nuts like the rest of the left with TDS/plandemic/climate change, but they used to publish good articles like this one exposing nefarious activities of the deep state, and did a lot of good reporting on the various criminal wars and government expansion in the Bush and Obama years.
I read the friggin' article, how do you think I found the Marx reference?! And I even went deeper into that website and looked on their "ABOUT" page. How do you think I found their dedication to "left-leaning" articles? Jeez Louise, already!
I am sorry to have assumed you didn't read the article. I just do not understand why you did not take this interview at face value to get a deeper understanding of the inner workings of the CIA.
Despite the reference to Karl Marx and the leftist leanings of the publication...did the questions reveal leftist bias or did you think the answers were not true or tainted by leftist indoctrination? This was an interview...not an opinion piece so I am somewhat lost on what was wrong with the interview...in your opinion...
I concur that we must be diligent on what we accept as "truth" and for that I give you a thumbs up...but I did find the interview a confirmation about what we already knew about the CIA..
And to you and yours. I'm sorry I over-reacted to your question, it just seemed to me, at the time, that it was an affront to my intellect. So yes, you're right about weighing and discerning truth out of bias. Looking for such bias in articles is my go-to position on everything I read. I just found the bias on that article a bit thick, making me suspect the entire article... at first.
I don't doubt that the SEE EYE EH are in bed with some very disreputable people and that they do some pretty disreputable things. No, I don't trust them to be working for America's best interests.
But the information war continues. Thanks for your civil response. Good anons can still agree to disagree and remain amicable about it.
From the article: "Karl Marx explained over 150 years ago how and why capitalists treat workers the same, whether at home or abroad."
From the "About" section of that website: "New articles, from an independent left-leaning perspective, are posted every weekday."
OP, why are you posting leftist propaganda here on GAW?
I'm not. I posted a highly informative interview with a former CIA operative.
Maybe. Given the admittedly left-leaning nature of that venue, I'm skeptical.
They went nuts like the rest of the left with TDS/plandemic/climate change, but they used to publish good articles like this one exposing nefarious activities of the deep state, and did a lot of good reporting on the various criminal wars and government expansion in the Bush and Obama years.
Yeah, that makes more sense now that you mention it. Thanks.
Try reading the article...it is quite informative...
I read the friggin' article, how do you think I found the Marx reference?! And I even went deeper into that website and looked on their "ABOUT" page. How do you think I found their dedication to "left-leaning" articles? Jeez Louise, already!
I am sorry to have assumed you didn't read the article. I just do not understand why you did not take this interview at face value to get a deeper understanding of the inner workings of the CIA.
Despite the reference to Karl Marx and the leftist leanings of the publication...did the questions reveal leftist bias or did you think the answers were not true or tainted by leftist indoctrination? This was an interview...not an opinion piece so I am somewhat lost on what was wrong with the interview...in your opinion...
I concur that we must be diligent on what we accept as "truth" and for that I give you a thumbs up...but I did find the interview a confirmation about what we already knew about the CIA..
God bless you and yours...
And to you and yours. I'm sorry I over-reacted to your question, it just seemed to me, at the time, that it was an affront to my intellect. So yes, you're right about weighing and discerning truth out of bias. Looking for such bias in articles is my go-to position on everything I read. I just found the bias on that article a bit thick, making me suspect the entire article... at first.
I don't doubt that the SEE EYE EH are in bed with some very disreputable people and that they do some pretty disreputable things. No, I don't trust them to be working for America's best interests.
But the information war continues. Thanks for your civil response. Good anons can still agree to disagree and remain amicable about it.