This was a discussion over ideals, with the implication that the cabal is dead and gone.
Convenient how you instantly turn it into a here and now discussion when it suits your narrative. People love doing that, I notice. Left, right, everyone. Any time anyone attempts to discuss an ideal, someone has to barge in with their doomer dogshit about how "REEEE THATS BAD BECAUSE GOOBERMINT EVIL!!!". That then becomes their response to just about everything that is said going forward. No actual solutions or arguments, just outright dismissal based on the way things are now, rather than how they will or should be if we're truly moving forward and improving.
Also, no one ever said anything about the goobermint taking their gold, nor is that even the original guy that you just responded to in your fervent rage over "crypto bad".
Take the loss and move on, fren, you've lost this one 10 times over.
For all you or anyone else in the public sector knows, the crypto market took off because the cabal sees the writing on the wall and dumped hundreds of billions of worthless paper they created out of thin air into crypto as an untouchable currency reserve in case Q/Trump confiscate their bank accounts.
Sure, and the cabal also likely created the internet for nefarious purposes, not expect us peons to destroy them with their own weapon. That would be a recurring theme if we did the same with crypto.
You're preaching crypto on a Q board with an unhinged bias and completely oblivious to its downsides.
Wrong. Didn't happen. You can't show that it happened. You can't even show me saying I think crypto is good because I didn't. What you can find is me calling your argument that crypto is bad because people get scammed garbage.
I don't know if it was you at this point, but this whole sub-thread started with some complete moron saying crypto was better than gold.
The sub-thread did not start with someone calling crypto better than gold. One person said that elsewhere in the thread, and you didn't reply to them. What you instead did was insert a meaning into what was said that wasn't present, and then argued your straw man.
That remains the problem here. You refuse to argue anything other than your straw man.
Pointing out the obvious flaws in crypto isn't "doomer" any more than telling someone not to risk their life savings on the stock market is "doomer".
No, responding to a discussion about ideals with a response about the current situation, in such a way as to dismiss the persons argument over the ideal situation, is. It's pretty much "yea, that's a good idea, but it won't work because [insert current issue that is assumed to not exist in the hypothetical ideal scenario]".
You'll never win any argument when you completely disregard counter points.
This is exclusively what you have done in response to everything I have said. But winning arguments is overrated anyway. I'd much rather be correct than win an argument online.
Nothing you are saying has any semblance of relevance to this discussion. You have made no counterpoints. The only counterpoints made were when I pointed out that being stupid and getting scammed is not the fault of crypto.
You don't even address the glaring pitfalls of crypto. Your head is buried in the sand. Neither you nor anyone else preaching crypto has even touched the premise of the thread, the concern that crypto market is about to be "heavily shaken" with 3rd party apps being banned from reddit and Binance being sued.
And you refuse to acknowledge any good that it has. You are quite literally guilty of everything you accuse the "crypto preachers" of. Your head is buried so deep in the sand that I'm surprised you can project so well from down there.
And there has been some discussion in the thread talking about the original topic and why the Reddit shit may or may not cause issues with crypto. Maybe not as much as there should be, but it is there. That you haven't found it doesn't help your case.
"As if the same government can't crack down on crypto exchanges."
Self custody, bro.
This was a discussion over ideals, with the implication that the cabal is dead and gone.
Convenient how you instantly turn it into a here and now discussion when it suits your narrative. People love doing that, I notice. Left, right, everyone. Any time anyone attempts to discuss an ideal, someone has to barge in with their doomer dogshit about how "REEEE THATS BAD BECAUSE GOOBERMINT EVIL!!!". That then becomes their response to just about everything that is said going forward. No actual solutions or arguments, just outright dismissal based on the way things are now, rather than how they will or should be if we're truly moving forward and improving.
Also, no one ever said anything about the goobermint taking their gold, nor is that even the original guy that you just responded to in your fervent rage over "crypto bad".
Take the loss and move on, fren, you've lost this one 10 times over.
Sure, and the cabal also likely created the internet for nefarious purposes, not expect us peons to destroy them with their own weapon. That would be a recurring theme if we did the same with crypto.
Wrong. Didn't happen. You can't show that it happened. You can't even show me saying I think crypto is good because I didn't. What you can find is me calling your argument that crypto is bad because people get scammed garbage.
The sub-thread did not start with someone calling crypto better than gold. One person said that elsewhere in the thread, and you didn't reply to them. What you instead did was insert a meaning into what was said that wasn't present, and then argued your straw man.
That remains the problem here. You refuse to argue anything other than your straw man.
No, responding to a discussion about ideals with a response about the current situation, in such a way as to dismiss the persons argument over the ideal situation, is. It's pretty much "yea, that's a good idea, but it won't work because [insert current issue that is assumed to not exist in the hypothetical ideal scenario]".
This is exclusively what you have done in response to everything I have said. But winning arguments is overrated anyway. I'd much rather be correct than win an argument online.
Nothing you are saying has any semblance of relevance to this discussion. You have made no counterpoints. The only counterpoints made were when I pointed out that being stupid and getting scammed is not the fault of crypto.
And you refuse to acknowledge any good that it has. You are quite literally guilty of everything you accuse the "crypto preachers" of. Your head is buried so deep in the sand that I'm surprised you can project so well from down there.
And there has been some discussion in the thread talking about the original topic and why the Reddit shit may or may not cause issues with crypto. Maybe not as much as there should be, but it is there. That you haven't found it doesn't help your case.