A Different Picture Of Tiananmen Square On It’s 34th Anniversary
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Yeah, you're hopeless. One of those sources isn't even a liberal paper. They are also claiming two different narratives, because they no longer mention the protestor violence and imply that it was a naked act of aggression. Both stories can't both be true, but somehow you "know" which one is true, despite not being there. This is not intellectual honesty or a search for truth.
The Wall Street Journal article was from 1989 though. The Tiananmen Square incident happened in 1989.
The Wall Street Journal was a conservative newspaper in 1989, by your own admission above. Your mistake here proves that you have no idea what you are talking about and are making up shit to reinforce your predetermined narrative.