I hear you. I get annoyed with the way articles are titled too. This one strikes me as being cleverly directed at the 29% to 31% of people who are still not awake, but eventually will be.
It avoids having them tune out by using a word that has been beat into their heads. . . Riot. And, at the same time informs them 65%, an overwhelming majority, of people believe the Feds provoked the J6 event.
That was already clever, but ending with the statement more people will realize that is true communicates the evidence is so strong an objective person will see this was staged.
I think there will be a tipping point in public opinion where your wording is used. Maybe we will even see normies getting an explanation about what constitutes a false flag.
Anyone who still believes thousands of gun-owning Trump-supporting American patriots WITHOUT ANY GUNS WHATSOEVER, who committed NO VIOLENCE as they were led peacefully through the building, respecting the velvet ropes along the way...nevertheless "violently stormed the Capitol"...is literally too stupid or too brainwashed to qualify to join a conversation about this.
Same as you don't get to show up and participate in a serious discussion about building a bridge or skyscraper when you have no math or engineering or architecture or construction background.
You simply don't qualify to be taken seriously, or even to be in the room.
Can you show me where anything I wrote says this wasn’t a false flag? My point was Rasmussen wrote the headline to convince more people this was a staged event.
They don’t need to wake us up, in fact, they can afford to piss us off because they know our minds won’t be changed, this was a false flag. It was a false flag staged to invoke the 25th Amendment against President Trump that day and immediately arrest him as soon as he was removed.
Sorry, if I somehow put you in a bad mood, because I have the same opinion you do about January 6, 2021.
Sorry you misunderstood, T. I wasn't directing the remarks at you, but at leftist morons buying the lie that there was a patriot insurrection. I totally agree with you that it wasn't a "riot"" FFS, that it was a false flag op. Hell, I've seen actual vid of antifa dorks changing into Trump gear in the bushes to go do riot stuff.
No one else controls my mood but me! :) No worries
The Feds provided the violent agitators and used the peaceful Trump supporters as extras in their "school play" to paint Trump and his supporters as violent insurrectionists. If Trump and his 80+ million mostly armed supporters had actually staged an insurrection, it would have looked very different.
I think this is gaslighting. There was no riot. There were people milling about.
Perhaps the headline should be "65 percent now understand that feds play-acted a riot to frame peaceful demonstrators"
I hear you. I get annoyed with the way articles are titled too. This one strikes me as being cleverly directed at the 29% to 31% of people who are still not awake, but eventually will be.
It avoids having them tune out by using a word that has been beat into their heads. . . Riot. And, at the same time informs them 65%, an overwhelming majority, of people believe the Feds provoked the J6 event.
That was already clever, but ending with the statement more people will realize that is true communicates the evidence is so strong an objective person will see this was staged.
I think there will be a tipping point in public opinion where your wording is used. Maybe we will even see normies getting an explanation about what constitutes a false flag.
Anyone who still believes thousands of gun-owning Trump-supporting American patriots WITHOUT ANY GUNS WHATSOEVER, who committed NO VIOLENCE as they were led peacefully through the building, respecting the velvet ropes along the way...nevertheless "violently stormed the Capitol"...is literally too stupid or too brainwashed to qualify to join a conversation about this.
Same as you don't get to show up and participate in a serious discussion about building a bridge or skyscraper when you have no math or engineering or architecture or construction background.
You simply don't qualify to be taken seriously, or even to be in the room.
Can you show me where anything I wrote says this wasn’t a false flag? My point was Rasmussen wrote the headline to convince more people this was a staged event.
They don’t need to wake us up, in fact, they can afford to piss us off because they know our minds won’t be changed, this was a false flag. It was a false flag staged to invoke the 25th Amendment against President Trump that day and immediately arrest him as soon as he was removed.
Sorry, if I somehow put you in a bad mood, because I have the same opinion you do about January 6, 2021.
Sorry you misunderstood, T. I wasn't directing the remarks at you, but at leftist morons buying the lie that there was a patriot insurrection. I totally agree with you that it wasn't a "riot"" FFS, that it was a false flag op. Hell, I've seen actual vid of antifa dorks changing into Trump gear in the bushes to go do riot stuff.
No one else controls my mood but me! :) No worries
Thanks! Glad I asked. Take care.
The Feds provided the violent agitators and used the peaceful Trump supporters as extras in their "school play" to paint Trump and his supporters as violent insurrectionists. If Trump and his 80+ million mostly armed supporters had actually staged an insurrection, it would have looked very different.