The only "fanciful history" is the leftist Wikipedia article you just quoted. You should know better to trust Wikipedia, which has consistently provided very suspect and dubious information. There was a pact made between Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei (N.A.) and Zionist International (Z.I.). In Jan 1933, Hitler's party had an immediate goal of finalizing the ‘Haavara’ (moving home) Agreement with Zionist International. In 1933-34 Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. Mildenstein, SS Office for Jewish Affairs, traveled to Palestine for half a year accompanied by Zionist officials and spent time at Kibbutz Farms. Zionists thanked Goebbels for the 'race Laws' of 1935.
Even so, the NSDAP was never the "N.A." and the World Zionist Organizaton was never the "Zionist International." The NSDAP was founded in 1920 in Bavaria. The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West. I didn't have to read Wikipedia to know this; I read "Mein Kampf" and "The Fuhrer," both of which are primary sources. If you can't get your basic history correct, I have little faith in the rest of your account.
You really don't know do you? Yet, you pretend to know. I've read those books you mentioned too. In fact I read Eisenhower’s book, *“Crusade in Europe”, Churchill's work, "The Second World War" (6-volumes), and Charles de Gaulle’s work, "The Complete War Memoirs" (3-volumes). That's a total of 10 volumes amounting to over 7000 pages. What is amazing about reading these works, there is not one mentioning of the holocaust in all those volumes. Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'.
Sadly, your tendency seems to run with the dubious Wikipedia version of history. Just as Germans don't call themselves "Germans" either. Along with this, the 'Deutsch' in the Party name is self-evident to the Deutsch of 'Deutschland' and is reiterative. Just as 'American' isn't need for Repubs and Dems. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionists is indeed true. Read Black's "the Transfer Agreement" or Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". Look it up in your go-to-faux-facts 'Wikipedia'. Even they will mention it and provide a concocted version of it.. And the part of having little faith, you already spent your account.
"Nazi" is merely the phonetic shorthand for the first two syllables of "National" (in German, the "z" is pronounced as a "ts"). It was a parallel to the "sotzi" used to designate the socialists.
You got the party founding all wrong. I don't know what insight Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP, but Hitler was instrumental, and Konrad Heiden was the closest journalistic observer from the formation up to 1933. And, by the way, it is not unusual for books written before an event to lack references to the event.
'Wikipedia' seems to be your source for history. Alas, history continues to be altered by those who own the publishing companies. The Rothschild's funded the rise of Hitler's and his Party. I showed you there was proof that an agreement was made between the Zionists and Hitler's Party. Even Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. I provided you two important sources for this agreement. Black's "The Transfer Agreement" and Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". You wrote, "...Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP,..." I never said this. You did. You completely missed the point. Moreover, you did write, "The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West." This is why I wrote, "Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'"......Ergo, regarding Eisenhower, Churchill, and DeGaulle's massive works (over 7000 pages). Albeit, 'Nazi' most likely is a Western concoction, it is IMHO derived from the aforementioned agreement. Again, the reason for the historical ambiguity is from an incessant cover-up of Zionists having a predominant hand in putting Hitler in power. Hitler's ‘Haavara’ Agreement was in essence a competing version of the Balfour Declaration.
The only "fanciful history" is the leftist Wikipedia article you just quoted. You should know better to trust Wikipedia, which has consistently provided very suspect and dubious information. There was a pact made between Nationalsozialistische Arbeiterpartei (N.A.) and Zionist International (Z.I.). In Jan 1933, Hitler's party had an immediate goal of finalizing the ‘Haavara’ (moving home) Agreement with Zionist International. In 1933-34 Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. Mildenstein, SS Office for Jewish Affairs, traveled to Palestine for half a year accompanied by Zionist officials and spent time at Kibbutz Farms. Zionists thanked Goebbels for the 'race Laws' of 1935.
Even so, the NSDAP was never the "N.A." and the World Zionist Organizaton was never the "Zionist International." The NSDAP was founded in 1920 in Bavaria. The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West. I didn't have to read Wikipedia to know this; I read "Mein Kampf" and "The Fuhrer," both of which are primary sources. If you can't get your basic history correct, I have little faith in the rest of your account.
You really don't know do you? Yet, you pretend to know. I've read those books you mentioned too. In fact I read Eisenhower’s book, *“Crusade in Europe”, Churchill's work, "The Second World War" (6-volumes), and Charles de Gaulle’s work, "The Complete War Memoirs" (3-volumes). That's a total of 10 volumes amounting to over 7000 pages. What is amazing about reading these works, there is not one mentioning of the holocaust in all those volumes. Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'.
Sadly, your tendency seems to run with the dubious Wikipedia version of history. Just as Germans don't call themselves "Germans" either. Along with this, the 'Deutsch' in the Party name is self-evident to the Deutsch of 'Deutschland' and is reiterative. Just as 'American' isn't need for Repubs and Dems. The agreement between Hitler and the Zionists is indeed true. Read Black's "the Transfer Agreement" or Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". Look it up in your go-to-faux-facts 'Wikipedia'. Even they will mention it and provide a concocted version of it.. And the part of having little faith, you already spent your account.
"Nazi" is merely the phonetic shorthand for the first two syllables of "National" (in German, the "z" is pronounced as a "ts"). It was a parallel to the "sotzi" used to designate the socialists.
You got the party founding all wrong. I don't know what insight Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP, but Hitler was instrumental, and Konrad Heiden was the closest journalistic observer from the formation up to 1933. And, by the way, it is not unusual for books written before an event to lack references to the event.
And what would be your point?
'Wikipedia' seems to be your source for history. Alas, history continues to be altered by those who own the publishing companies. The Rothschild's funded the rise of Hitler's and his Party. I showed you there was proof that an agreement was made between the Zionists and Hitler's Party. Even Goebbels had a special German coin minted to celebrate Zionism and it had a Star of David on one side and a Swastika on the other side. I provided you two important sources for this agreement. Black's "The Transfer Agreement" and Benjamin Freedman's, "Facts Are Facts". You wrote, "...Eisenhower or DeGaulle had into the forming of the NSDAP,..." I never said this. You did. You completely missed the point. Moreover, you did write, "The Party never referred to itself as the "Nazi Party," even though that came to be its attribution in the West." This is why I wrote, "Nor is there any mentioning of the origin of 'Nazi'"......Ergo, regarding Eisenhower, Churchill, and DeGaulle's massive works (over 7000 pages). Albeit, 'Nazi' most likely is a Western concoction, it is IMHO derived from the aforementioned agreement. Again, the reason for the historical ambiguity is from an incessant cover-up of Zionists having a predominant hand in putting Hitler in power. Hitler's ‘Haavara’ Agreement was in essence a competing version of the Balfour Declaration.