What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
This is from
I am struggling to find it! I've been using justia.com and some other sources to try and track this down but I can't seem to find any casework related to "Military Intelligence".
https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/separation-of-powers/
https://law.justia.com/lawsearch?query=%22military%20intelligence%22
Any anons have better luck than me on this one? I don't see it in the "Answers" on https://qanon.pub
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151643575
“supreme court military intelligence state secrets”
“supreme court military intelligence state secrets agency”
“supreme court military intelligence state secrets congress”
Etc.
I hope that helps, but I am still refreshing my memory. I do recall that the Reynolds’s case was mentioned quite a bit. U.S. v Reynolds’s regarding state secrets.
Yeah Reynolds is the state secrets case but the case Q references here appears to decide whether MI has authority over legislated entities, and I suspect that the decision was in favor of the military.
Derek Johnson speaks about that case, and I want to say Marbury v Madison, but i just reviewed that and I'm not sure it fits. It was a much older case, iirc. If i think of it, I'll get back to you. I know what you're referring to.
Marbury v Madison says that an unconstitutional law can be ignored.
Yeah I don't see anything military related in Marbury vs. Madison, though I suppose this could be buried somewhere.
I feel like cross referencing with Insurrection Act invocations is a plausible starting point.
Hmmm…. I will keep looking. I have not reviewed the early Q posts in a while. There were some EO’s signed by Bush Jr. relating to the MI.