You do realize that DaVinci being gay is just a rewrite of history by these same people, yes? Read his actual writings. There are several passages that make it clear he wasn't gay. In fact, if you read enough of his writings, you'll begin to see that he struggled with the desire for women on a primal level versus his intellectual reflection on the subject and his disgust with the lack of cleanliness that was rampant in his day.
I urge anyone with access to read DaVinci. He was definitely brilliant, but the pop culture portrayal of his character is a travesty of academia pseudo-intellectual gaywashing. It's no different than several other recent revisions of history. He was the pinnacle of intelligence in his day, and the ego of the modern academia "intellectual" has an inherent need to remake him in their own image.
Of note, we see the same behavior with all ego-driven, low intelligence groups that cling to a false facade of superiority. Such groups come in all colors and creeds, including as you named, those who care what race Jesus might have been. Academia is almost exclusively such a group at this point, as well.
I am guessing you are, like myself, on this site as a curiosity, not as a follower of Q. Try treating the people here with respect. I may not agree with everything they believe, or even close, but I do believe that most here are good people that want the best for all. When you disrespect that, you only look foolish to everyone.
You do realize that DaVinci being gay is just a rewrite of history by these same people, yes? Read his actual writings. There are several passages that make it clear he wasn't gay. In fact, if you read enough of his writings, you'll begin to see that he struggled with the desire for women on a primal level versus his intellectual reflection on the subject and his disgust with the lack of cleanliness that was rampant in his day.
I urge anyone with access to read DaVinci. He was definitely brilliant, but the pop culture portrayal of his character is a travesty of academia pseudo-intellectual gaywashing. It's no different than several other recent revisions of history. He was the pinnacle of intelligence in his day, and the ego of the modern academia "intellectual" has an inherent need to remake him in their own image.
Of note, we see the same behavior with all ego-driven, low intelligence groups that cling to a false facade of superiority. Such groups come in all colors and creeds, including as you named, those who care what race Jesus might have been. Academia is almost exclusively such a group at this point, as well.
I am guessing you are, like myself, on this site as a curiosity, not as a follower of Q. Try treating the people here with respect. I may not agree with everything they believe, or even close, but I do believe that most here are good people that want the best for all. When you disrespect that, you only look foolish to everyone.
Give it a few years and these same people will start rewriting history to say Da Vinci was trans.
Gullible people fall for this bullshit all the time.
The TV is lying to you, everyone. Just because some History Channel documentary said xyz, it does not mean xyz ever happened, or even existed.